Air Force logo

Air Force

3-29
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
1.4%Air Force
98.6%Navy
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNavy -28.9
PROJECTED TOTAL139.8
MODEL MONEYLINENavy -7043
Navy logo

Navy

26-8
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAir Force 55
Projected Total139.8
Projected ScoreNavy 84

Team Comparison

23MMH Power Index56.8
91.3Offensive Efficiency113.2
118.5Defensive Efficiency97.6
-27.2Net Efficiency15.6
6.2Strength of Schedule-8.1
-33.5Last 10 Net Efficiency16.4
67.4Tempo65.9
49.0%Effective FG%53.7%
21.9%Turnover Rate17.1%
21.4%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
35.9%Free Throw Rate40.9%
-18.3Average Margin10.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Navy HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY98.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNavy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.8–23.0), offensive efficiency (113.2–91.3), defensive efficiency (97.6–118.5), net efficiency (15.6–-27.2).
Air Force COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (6.2–-8.1).
Final
Air Force logo
Air Force
56—61
Navy logo
Navy
Navy by 5 • 63.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Air ForceTEAM STATNavy
21-53FG21-53
40.0%FG%40.0%
6-253PT5-15
24.0%3PT%33.0%
8-14FT14-15
57.0%FT%93.0%
33Rebounds36
6Offensive Rebounds6
11Assists15
11Turnovers8
4Steals5
5Blocks4
17Fouls16

Player Box Score

Air Force
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kam SandersG344-122-65-743000015
Caleb WalkerF196-90-00-143000012
Lucas HobinF344-112-80-070010010
Justin HindsG273-72-50-06011008
Wesley CelichowskiC212-70-33-41203007
Eli RobinsonF281-10-00-06300002
Kolby GillesF121-30-10-21010002
Ethan GreenbergG170-20-20-01010000
A.J. PattersonG80-10-00-01010000
Navy
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Austin BenigniG407-153-68-875100025
Aidan KehoeC365-80-00-0151130010
Jinwoo KimG333-112-42-235100010
Donovan DraperF273-70-12-23001008
Jordan PennickG241-40-22-22100004
Mike WoodsF251-50-00-01210002
Cam ColeG131-30-20-12100002
Cooper JacksonF20-00-00-00010000

Advanced Game Stats

63.4Possessions63.4
88.3Offensive Efficiency96.2
96.2Defensive Efficiency88.3
-7.9Net Efficiency7.9
45.3%Effective FG%44.3%
46.9%True Shooting %50.7%
17.0%Turnover Rate12.9%
26.4%Free Throw Rate28.3%
47.2%3-Point Rate28.3%
1.00Assist / Turnover1.88
Game Summary
Navy won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 63.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.