
Austin Peay
22-9GAME THAT MATTERSAT
35.0%Austin Peay
65.0%UT Rio Grande Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -4.3
PROJECTED TOTAL152.1
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -186

UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAustin Peay 74
Projected Total152.1
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 78
Team Comparison
54.8MMH Power Index55.8
115.0Offensive Efficiency112.6
103.1Defensive Efficiency103.1
11.9Net Efficiency9.5
-5.8Strength of Schedule-1.9
8.1Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3
71.0Tempo67.4
53.9%Effective FG%55.7%
15.3%Turnover Rate17.9%
30.3%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
39.0%Free Throw Rate29.6%
8.4Average Margin6.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Austin Peay HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY65.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAustin Peay holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (115.0–112.6), net efficiency (11.9–9.5), ball security (15.3–17.9), offensive rebounding (30.3–29.2).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (55.8–54.8), strength of schedule (-1.9–-5.8), recent form (12.3–8.1).