Rider

4-25

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

5.0%Rider

95.0%Quinnipiac

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -20.0

PROJECTED TOTAL143.8

MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -1900

Quinnipiac

19-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreRider 62

Projected Total143.8

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 82

Team Comparison

RiderMetricQuinnipiac

29.1MMH Power Index51

96.3Offensive Efficiency106.8

115.3Defensive Efficiency102.1

-19.0Net Efficiency4.7

-0.9Strength of Schedule-2.3

-17.7Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2

65.9Tempo70.5

43.4%Effective FG%48.9%

17.1%Turnover Rate15.6%

32.8%Offensive Rebound %34.1%

31.5%Free Throw Rate34.1%

-12.6Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–29.1), offensive efficiency (106.8–96.3), defensive efficiency (102.1–115.3), net efficiency (4.7–-19.0).

Rider COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.9–-2.3).

Final

Rider

58—72

Quinnipiac

Quinnipiac by 14 • 68.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

RiderTEAM STATQuinnipiac

24-62FG30-70

39.0%FG%43.0%

6-143PT6-18

43.0%3PT%33.0%

4-8FT6-9

50.0%FT%67.0%

37Rebounds39

11Offensive Rebounds13

9Assists18

13Turnovers8

7Steals9

9Blocks5

11Fouls11

Player Box Score

Rider

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
AB Coulibaly	G	32	9-16	2-4	0-0	9	1	2	1	20
Antwan Wilson	G	20	5-9	3-5	0-0	4	2	1	0	13
Flash Burton	G	30	3-15	0-2	3-4	2	2	0	0	9
Shemani Fuller	F	18	2-3	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	2	4
Cole McCabe	F	17	2-4	0-0	0-0	5	0	0	3	4
Kristupas Kepežinskas	G	16	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	1	1	1	3
Caleb Smith	G	28	1-7	0-1	0-0	5	0	2	1	2
Mohamad Diallo	F	15	1-3	0-0	0-2	6	0	0	0	2
Davis Bynum	F	6	0-1	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	0	1
Jamir McNeil	G	9	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	1	0
Devean Williams	G	9	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	2	1	0	0

Quinnipiac

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaden Zimmerman	G	35	8-14	2-4	1-2	6	0	0	1	19
Amarri Monroe	F	34	6-14	1-4	1-1	10	4	1	1	14
Asim Jones	G	26	5-8	2-2	0-1	4	8	3	0	12
Keith McKnight	G	22	3-7	1-1	4-4	5	0	2	2	11
Grant Randall	F	25	3-12	0-3	0-0	6	0	1	1	6
Spence Wewe	F	17	3-7	0-0	0-0	6	1	1	0	6
Tai Turnage	G	14	2-4	0-1	0-1	0	5	1	0	4
Samson Reilly	G	12	0-3	0-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Nate Guerengomba	G	8	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Sam Nosakhare	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Ronell Giles Jr.	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.6Possessions68.6

84.5Offensive Efficiency105.0

105.0Defensive Efficiency84.5

-20.4Net Efficiency20.4

43.5%Effective FG%47.1%

44.1%True Shooting %48.5%

19.2%Turnover Rate11.5%

12.9%Free Throw Rate12.9%

22.6%3-Point Rate25.7%

0.69Assist / Turnover2.25

Game Summary

Quinnipiac won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 68.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.