Alabama State

10-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

13.9%Alabama State

86.1%UT Martin

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Martin -13.9

PROJECTED TOTAL141.4

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Martin -619

UT Martin

22-11

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAlabama State 64

Projected Total141.4

Projected ScoreUT Martin 78

Team Comparison

Alabama StateMetricUT Martin

38MMH Power Index49.8

101.7Offensive Efficiency103.8

107.4Defensive Efficiency94.0

-5.7Net Efficiency9.8

-6.2Strength of Schedule-4.8

0.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.8

71.9Tempo67.2

48.2%Effective FG%49.5%

18.2%Turnover Rate21.4%

32.6%Offensive Rebound %37.9%

35.8%Free Throw Rate37.5%

-4.1Average Margin6.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Martin HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY86.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Martin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.8–38.0), offensive efficiency (103.8–101.7), defensive efficiency (94.0–107.4), net efficiency (9.8–-5.7).

Alabama State COUNTERS WITHrecent form (0.0–-0.8), ball security (18.2–21.4).

Final

Alabama State

64—74

UT Martin

UT Martin by 10 • 66.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Alabama StateTEAM STATUT Martin

23-51FG27-63

45.0%FG%43.0%

7-183PT9-29

39.0%3PT%31.0%

11-19FT11-23

58.0%FT%48.0%

32Rebounds44

8Offensive Rebounds20

12Assists15

13Turnovers13

5Steals10

5Blocks5

21Fouls17

Player Box Score

Alabama State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Byrd	G	20	5-6	1-1	4-6	4	2	2	0	15
Micah Simpson	G	35	4-14	2-6	2-4	3	2	0	1	12
Jerquarius Stanback	F	29	4-7	0-2	4-7	4	0	1	4	12
Asjon Anderson	G	32	5-15	1-5	0-0	2	4	0	0	11
Damarien Yates	G	12	2-3	2-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Cameron Palesse	G	35	2-4	1-1	0-0	6	3	0	0	5
R'Chaun King	F	22	1-2	0-0	1-2	3	1	2	0	3
Mario Andrews	C	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	0
Tyler Mason	F	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

UT Martin

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Andrija Bukumirovic	F	33	5-13	1-5	4-6	13	2	1	2	15
Matas Deniusas	F	28	6-12	2-5	1-5	0	1	2	0	15
Filip Radakovic	G	32	4-8	1-2	5-7	4	2	0	0	14
Damien King	G	22	6-10	1-2	1-2	7	1	4	1	14
Filip Petkovski	G	28	2-5	2-4	0-0	6	4	1	0	6
Ty Price	G	9	1-6	1-5	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
AJ Hopkins	F	4	1-1	1-1	0-0	2	0	0	1	3
Afan Trnka	G	26	1-5	0-4	0-0	4	4	1	0	2
Vladimir Khryapa	F	15	1-3	0-1	0-3	3	1	1	1	2
Luca Colceag	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.0Possessions66.0

97.0Offensive Efficiency112.1

112.1Defensive Efficiency97.0

-15.2Net Efficiency15.2

52.0%Effective FG%50.0%

53.3%True Shooting %50.1%

20.0%Turnover Rate19.4%

37.3%Free Throw Rate36.5%

35.3%3-Point Rate46.0%

0.92Assist / Turnover1.15

Game Summary

UT Martin won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 66.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.