
UNLV
18-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.8%UNLV
77.2%Stanford
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADStanford -8.3
PROJECTED TOTAL156.0
MODEL MONEYLINEStanford -339

Stanford
20-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUNLV 74
Projected Total156.0
Projected ScoreStanford 82
Team Comparison
52.8MMH Power Index59.2
111.0Offensive Efficiency111.6
109.6Defensive Efficiency107.1
1.4Net Efficiency4.5
2.7Strength of Schedule5.2
1.1Last 10 Net Efficiency7.4
71.4Tempo68.1
53.7%Effective FG%51.9%
17.2%Turnover Rate15.5%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %32.4%
41.6%Free Throw Rate37.2%
1.0Average Margin3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Stanford HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY77.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStanford holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.2–52.8), offensive efficiency (111.6–111.0), defensive efficiency (107.1–109.6), net efficiency (4.5–1.4).
UNLV COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (53.7–51.9), free throw rate (41.6–37.2).