UNLV logo

UNLV

18-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.8%UNLV
77.2%Stanford
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADStanford -8.3
PROJECTED TOTAL156.0
MODEL MONEYLINEStanford -339
Stanford logo

Stanford

20-13
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUNLV 74
Projected Total156.0
Projected ScoreStanford 82

Team Comparison

52.8MMH Power Index59.2
111.0Offensive Efficiency111.6
109.6Defensive Efficiency107.1
1.4Net Efficiency4.5
2.7Strength of Schedule5.2
1.1Last 10 Net Efficiency7.4
71.4Tempo68.1
53.7%Effective FG%51.9%
17.2%Turnover Rate15.5%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %32.4%
41.6%Free Throw Rate37.2%
1.0Average Margin3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Stanford HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY77.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStanford holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.2–52.8), offensive efficiency (111.6–111.0), defensive efficiency (107.1–109.6), net efficiency (4.5–1.4).
UNLV COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (53.7–51.9), free throw rate (41.6–37.2).
Final
UNLV logo
UNLV
75—74
Stanford logo
Stanford
UNLV by 1 • 72.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UNLVTEAM STATStanford
28-58FG24-63
48.0%FG%38.0%
3-103PT9-30
30.0%3PT%30.0%
16-27FT17-27
59.0%FT%63.0%
34Rebounds46
12Offensive Rebounds20
7Assists10
14Turnovers16
10Steals11
4Blocks5
19Fouls17

Player Box Score

UNLV
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Emmanuel StephenC308-130-02-5100100018
Dra Gibbs-LawhornG355-91-34-652210015
Kimani HamiltonF326-120-13-643410015
Tyrin JonesF243-60-05-820010011
Issac WilliamsonG252-80-12-23110006
Naas CunninghamF202-51-30-00000005
Al GreenG121-31-20-04120003
Walter BrownF211-20-00-02001002
Stanford
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ebuka OkorieG334-161-69-1253210018
Ryan AgarwalG275-83-60-030200013
Benny GealerG233-83-82-241000011
Oskar GiltayF234-60-01-414022009
Jeremy Dent-SmithG233-101-72-23110009
Chisom OkparaF292-71-33-45421008
AJ RohosyF173-80-00-35011006
Aidan CammannF180-00-00-01110000
Kristers SkrindaF60-00-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

72.3Possessions72.3
103.7Offensive Efficiency102.4
102.4Defensive Efficiency103.7
1.4Net Efficiency-1.4
50.9%Effective FG%45.2%
52.9%True Shooting %48.8%
19.2%Turnover Rate22.3%
46.6%Free Throw Rate42.9%
17.2%3-Point Rate47.6%
0.50Assist / Turnover0.63
Game Summary
UNLV won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 72.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, True Shooting %, Free Throw Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.