
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
61.6%Hofstra
38.4%Pittsburgh
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -2.7
PROJECTED TOTAL142.4
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -160

Pittsburgh
13-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 73
Projected Total142.4
Projected ScorePittsburgh 70
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index50.5
114.0Offensive Efficiency108.4
100.9Defensive Efficiency110.4
13.1Net Efficiency-2.0
-2.9Strength of Schedule5.5
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.9
66.2Tempo65.0
52.2%Effective FG%51.4%
16.1%Turnover Rate17.3%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %33.1%
32.0%Free Throw Rate31.2%
8.7Average Margin-1.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY61.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–50.5), offensive efficiency (114.0–108.4), defensive efficiency (100.9–110.4), net efficiency (13.1–-2.0).
Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.5–-2.9).