Hofstra logo

Hofstra

24-11
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
61.6%Hofstra
38.4%Pittsburgh
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -2.7
PROJECTED TOTAL142.4
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -160
Pittsburgh logo

Pittsburgh

13-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 73
Projected Total142.4
Projected ScorePittsburgh 70

Team Comparison

59.3MMH Power Index50.5
114.0Offensive Efficiency108.4
100.9Defensive Efficiency110.4
13.1Net Efficiency-2.0
-2.9Strength of Schedule5.5
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.9
66.2Tempo65.0
52.2%Effective FG%51.4%
16.1%Turnover Rate17.3%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %33.1%
32.0%Free Throw Rate31.2%
8.7Average Margin-1.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY61.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–50.5), offensive efficiency (114.0–108.4), defensive efficiency (100.9–110.4), net efficiency (13.1–-2.0).
Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.5–-2.9).
Final
Hofstra logo
Hofstra
80—73
Pittsburgh logo
Pittsburgh
Hofstra by 7 • 61.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HofstraTEAM STATPittsburgh
29-55FG22-48
53.0%FG%46.0%
8-203PT10-23
40.0%3PT%43.0%
14-18FT19-22
78.0%FT%86.0%
26Rebounds26
8Offensive Rebounds8
17Assists14
7Turnovers10
3Steals2
1Blocks2
14Fouls16

Player Box Score

Hofstra
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cruz DavisG4014-255-113-527010036
Victory OnuetuF245-50-00-040100010
German PlotnikovG383-42-30-05100008
Preston EdmeadG330-60-48-92400008
Jaeden RobertsG72-31-12-21200007
Silas SundayF163-40-00-03200006
Biggie PattersonG252-50-11-25110005
Joshua DeCadyF170-30-00-02010000
Pittsburgh
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Brandin CummingsG3210-155-89-925000034
Barry Dunning Jr.G404-72-43-481120013
Cameron CorhenF392-70-23-56500007
Damarco MinorG321-41-34-42200007
Omari WitherspoonG322-41-30-03100005
Nojus IndrusaitisG162-61-10-01000005
Roman SiulepaF81-50-20-01010002
Kieran MullenC10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

61.6Possessions61.6
129.9Offensive Efficiency118.5
118.5Defensive Efficiency129.9
11.4Net Efficiency-11.4
60.0%Effective FG%56.3%
62.9%True Shooting %62.4%
11.2%Turnover Rate16.5%
32.7%Free Throw Rate45.8%
36.4%3-Point Rate47.9%
2.43Assist / Turnover1.40
Game Summary
Hofstra won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 61.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.