
Texas A&M
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.7%Texas A&M
73.3%SMU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -6.9
PROJECTED TOTAL162.6
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -275

SMU
20-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 78
Projected Total162.6
Projected ScoreSMU 85
Team Comparison
58MMH Power Index62.5
116.1Offensive Efficiency118.2
108.4Defensive Efficiency109.6
7.7Net Efficiency8.6
4.8Strength of Schedule7.0
-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3
69.1Tempo71.1
53.5%Effective FG%55.7%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.7%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
37.5%Free Throw Rate31.3%
5.3Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
SMU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–58.0), offensive efficiency (118.2–116.1), net efficiency (8.6–7.7), strength of schedule (7.0–4.8).
Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.4–109.6), ball security (14.8–15.7), free throw rate (37.5–31.3).