UAlbany

11-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

4.2%UAlbany

95.8%Yale

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADYale -19.7

PROJECTED TOTAL143.2

MODEL MONEYLINEYale -2281

Yale

23-7

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUAlbany 62

Projected Total143.2

Projected ScoreYale 81

Team Comparison

UAlbanyMetricYale

41.9MMH Power Index65.4

107.9Offensive Efficiency121.4

108.8Defensive Efficiency105.8

-0.9Net Efficiency15.6

-6.1Strength of Schedule1.6

0.0Last 10 Net Efficiency8.9

64.3Tempo64.5

52.8%Effective FG%56.8%

18.6%Turnover Rate13.9%

34.3%Offensive Rebound %33.3%

25.0%Free Throw Rate34.4%

-0.6Average Margin10.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Yale HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMYale holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.4–41.9), offensive efficiency (121.4–107.9), defensive efficiency (105.8–108.8), net efficiency (15.6–-0.9).

UAlbany COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (34.3–33.3).

Final

UAlbany

0—0

Yale

Tied • 0.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UAlbanyTEAM STATYale

null-nullFGnull-null

0.0%FG%0.0%

null-null3PTnull-null

0.0%3PT%0.0%

null-nullFTnull-null

0.0%FT%0.0%

—Rebounds—

—Offensive Rebounds—

—Assists—

—Turnovers—

—Steals—

—Blocks—

—Fouls—

Advanced Game Stats

0.0Possessions0.0

0.0Offensive Efficiency0.0

0.0Defensive Efficiency0.0

0.0Net Efficiency0.0

0.0%Effective FG%0.0%

0.0%True Shooting %0.0%

0.0%Turnover Rate0.0%

0.0%Free Throw Rate0.0%

0.0%3-Point Rate0.0%

0.00Assist / Turnover0.00

Game Summary

Neither team finished level. The game played at approximately 0.0 possessions.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.