Merrimack

23-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

65.2%Merrimack

34.8%Princeton

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMerrimack -2.7

PROJECTED TOTAL136.7

MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -187

Princeton

9-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMerrimack 70

Projected Total136.7

Projected ScorePrinceton 67

Team Comparison

MerrimackMetricPrinceton

53.7MMH Power Index43.5

106.4Offensive Efficiency105.1

103.2Defensive Efficiency110.3

3.2Net Efficiency-5.2

0.7Strength of Schedule1.7

12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.2

64.4Tempo65.2

49.3%Effective FG%50.3%

14.8%Turnover Rate16.9%

24.7%Offensive Rebound %27.5%

39.5%Free Throw Rate35.0%

2.1Average Margin-3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY65.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–43.5), offensive efficiency (106.4–105.1), defensive efficiency (103.2–110.3), net efficiency (3.2–-5.2).

Princeton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–0.7), shooting efficiency (50.3–49.3), offensive rebounding (27.5–24.7).

Final

Merrimack

59—56

Princeton

Merrimack by 3 • 57.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MerrimackTEAM STATPrinceton

18-46FG17-57

39.0%FG%30.0%

5-193PT5-17

26.0%3PT%29.0%

18-20FT17-21

90.0%FT%81.0%

26Rebounds45

3Offensive Rebounds19

9Assists8

5Turnovers10

6Steals4

6Blocks2

16Fouls15

Player Box Score

Merrimack

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ernest Shelton	G	39	4-10	2-4	6-8	1	1	0	0	16
Kevair Kennedy	G	39	3-7	0-0	8-8	6	4	0	0	14
Tye Dorset	G	34	4-9	1-4	2-2	2	1	3	1	11
Andrés Marrero	G	24	3-12	1-8	0-0	5	2	1	0	7
Todd Brogna	F	29	2-4	1-3	0-0	4	1	0	2	5
KC Ugwuakazi	F	18	2-3	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	0	4
Dylan Veillette	F	9	0-0	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	3	2
Aliou Cisse	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Jaylen Stinson	G	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	0

Princeton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jackson Hicke	G	39	8-12	3-4	2-2	9	5	0	0	21
Sebastian Whitfield	F	26	3-8	1-2	2-2	3	0	0	0	9
Malik Abdullahi	F	19	1-5	0-0	6-6	8	0	0	0	8
CJ Happy	F	17	2-7	0-0	2-3	6	1	0	1	6
Jack Stanton	G	24	1-5	1-4	2-2	3	2	1	1	5
Jacob Huggins	F	16	2-11	0-0	1-3	3	0	1	0	5
Jake Sussberg	G	20	0-3	0-2	2-3	4	0	1	0	2
Landon Clark	G	29	0-5	0-4	0-0	5	0	1	0	0
Peyton Seals	G	8	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Jacob Hammond	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

57.8Possessions57.8

102.1Offensive Efficiency96.9

96.9Defensive Efficiency102.1

5.2Net Efficiency-5.2

44.6%Effective FG%34.2%

53.2%True Shooting %41.8%

8.7%Turnover Rate17.2%

43.5%Free Throw Rate36.8%

41.3%3-Point Rate29.8%

1.80Assist / Turnover0.80

Game Summary

Merrimack won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 57.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in True Shooting %, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.