UT Arlington

18-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

23.1%UT Arlington

76.9%UT Rio Grande Valley

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -7.8

PROJECTED TOTAL140.8

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -333

UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Arlington 66

Projected Total140.8

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 74

Team Comparison

UT ArlingtonMetricUT Rio Grande Valley

49.6MMH Power Index55.8

102.7Offensive Efficiency112.6

97.9Defensive Efficiency103.1

4.8Net Efficiency9.5

-0.8Strength of Schedule-1.9

-3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3

68.1Tempo67.4

48.5%Effective FG%55.7%

20.4%Turnover Rate17.9%

36.0%Offensive Rebound %29.2%

43.7%Free Throw Rate29.6%

3.3Average Margin6.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–49.6), offensive efficiency (112.6–102.7), net efficiency (9.5–4.8), recent form (12.3–-3.9).

UT Arlington COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (97.9–103.1), strength of schedule (-0.8–-1.9), offensive rebounding (36.0–29.2).

Final

UT Arlington

58—50

UT Rio Grande Valley

UT Arlington by 8 • 57.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT ArlingtonTEAM STATUT Rio Grande Valley

22-52FG18-47

42.0%FG%38.0%

6-233PT6-20

26.0%3PT%30.0%

8-11FT8-11

73.0%FT%73.0%

39Rebounds25

13Offensive Rebounds5

14Assists12

13Turnovers11

3Steals9

5Blocks2

11Fouls10

Player Box Score

UT Arlington

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Marcell McCreary	G	33	4-12	3-9	3-4	7	2	0	0	14
Raysean Seamster	F	35	5-7	1-2	1-2	7	1	0	2	12
Marcus Rigsby Jr.	G	20	5-7	2-3	0-0	4	2	1	1	12
Cameron Jackson	F	31	5-9	0-0	0-0	6	2	0	2	10
Bahsil Laster	G	20	2-2	0-0	0-1	3	0	0	0	4
Jordan Lowery	G	25	0-9	0-6	2-2	2	5	1	0	2
Cash Chavis	G	15	0-3	0-2	2-2	1	1	1	0	2
Tyran Mason	G	12	1-3	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Amari Reed	F	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Marvin McGhee III	G	22	3-4	2-3	2-2	0	0	3	0	10
Zae Blake	G	35	3-6	3-4	0-0	2	2	0	0	9
Filip Brankovic	F	27	3-9	1-6	2-2	6	3	3	0	9
Koree Cotton	G	30	2-9	0-2	3-4	6	1	0	2	7
Always Wright	G	24	3-6	0-1	0-1	3	3	1	0	6
Kwo Agwa	F	11	2-3	0-1	1-2	2	0	0	0	5
Julien Gomez	G	18	1-2	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	0	2
Jaylen Washington	G	18	1-5	0-1	0-0	1	2	1	0	2
Dane Christensen	F	7	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Demarris Winters	G	5	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Marshal Destremau	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

57.7Possessions57.7

100.5Offensive Efficiency86.7

86.7Defensive Efficiency100.5

13.9Net Efficiency-13.9

48.1%Effective FG%44.7%

50.7%True Shooting %47.9%

22.7%Turnover Rate18.9%

21.2%Free Throw Rate23.4%

44.2%3-Point Rate42.6%

1.08Assist / Turnover1.09

Game Summary

UT Arlington won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 57.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.