Army

11-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

4.8%Army

95.2%UMBC

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUMBC -19.4

PROJECTED TOTAL144.7

MODEL MONEYLINEUMBC -1983

UMBC

24-8

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreArmy 63

Projected Total144.7

Projected ScoreUMBC 82

Team Comparison

ArmyMetricUMBC

36.8MMH Power Index59.1

104.8Offensive Efficiency113.0

112.1Defensive Efficiency99.0

-7.3Net Efficiency14.0

-3.3Strength of Schedule-5.6

-10.6Last 10 Net Efficiency24.7

68.9Tempo65.5

49.8%Effective FG%54.3%

17.3%Turnover Rate14.3%

31.0%Offensive Rebound %25.2%

26.5%Free Throw Rate34.1%

-5.1Average Margin9.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UMBC HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUMBC holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–36.8), offensive efficiency (113.0–104.8), defensive efficiency (99.0–112.1), net efficiency (14.0–-7.3).

Army COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-3.3–-5.6), offensive rebounding (31.0–25.2).

Final

Army

63—60

UMBC

Army by 3 • 66.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ArmyTEAM STATUMBC

20-57FG23-58

35.0%FG%40.0%

7-223PT8-28

32.0%3PT%29.0%

16-20FT6-16

80.0%FT%38.0%

43Rebounds37

10Offensive Rebounds8

8Assists12

10Turnovers8

4Steals5

2Blocks5

18Fouls15

Player Box Score

Army

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jacen Holloway	F	33	4-9	0-2	4-4	4	2	1	1	12
Jaxson Bell	G	30	2-9	1-3	7-8	10	0	1	0	12
Jorn Everson	F	19	4-9	1-4	2-2	0	1	0	0	11
Jackson Furman	G	24	3-9	3-6	0-0	6	1	1	0	9
Ryan Curry	G	35	2-7	1-5	3-3	4	3	0	0	8
Tate Laczkowski	F	24	2-5	0-0	0-3	4	1	0	1	4
Joshua Eli	F	13	2-7	0-0	0-0	4	0	1	0	4
Kevin McCarthy	G	22	1-2	1-2	0-0	7	0	0	0	3

UMBC

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
DJ Armstrong Jr.	G	35	5-15	4-13	0-0	2	1	0	0	14
Jah'Likai King	G	37	5-14	1-3	0-0	4	3	1	0	11
Caden Diggs	F	24	4-9	2-5	0-0	8	2	1	2	10
Ace Valentine	G	33	3-8	0-4	2-6	8	4	2	1	8
Riley Jacobs	F	14	2-3	0-1	3-5	1	0	0	1	7
Jose Roberto Tanchyn	F	6	2-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
Josh Odunowo	F	27	1-5	0-0	1-2	8	0	1	0	3
Cougar Downing	G	7	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Daylon Dickerson	F	17	0-0	0-0	0-3	3	2	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.1Possessions66.1

95.3Offensive Efficiency90.8

90.8Defensive Efficiency95.3

4.5Net Efficiency-4.5

41.2%Effective FG%46.6%

47.4%True Shooting %45.7%

15.0%Turnover Rate12.2%

35.1%Free Throw Rate27.6%

38.6%3-Point Rate48.3%

0.80Assist / Turnover1.50

Game Summary

Army won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 66.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.