
South Carolina State
10-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.4%South Carolina State
94.6%Queens University
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -18.7
PROJECTED TOTAL160.6
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -1752

Queens University
21-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSouth Carolina State 71
Projected Total160.6
Projected ScoreQueens University 90
Team Comparison
30.5MMH Power Index51.7
95.6Offensive Efficiency118.4
112.3Defensive Efficiency117.0
-16.7Net Efficiency1.4
-2.7Strength of Schedule0.1
-6.9Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5
70.2Tempo71.4
46.7%Effective FG%56.6%
21.1%Turnover Rate14.8%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
42.0%Free Throw Rate37.6%
-11.7Average Margin0.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY94.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–30.5), offensive efficiency (118.4–95.6), net efficiency (1.4–-16.7), strength of schedule (0.1–-2.7).
South Carolina State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (112.3–117.0), offensive rebounding (31.7–29.6), free throw rate (42.0–37.6).