South Carolina State logo

South Carolina State

10-22
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.4%South Carolina State
94.6%Queens University
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -18.7
PROJECTED TOTAL160.6
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -1752
Queens University logo

Queens University

21-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSouth Carolina State 71
Projected Total160.6
Projected ScoreQueens University 90

Team Comparison

30.5MMH Power Index51.7
95.6Offensive Efficiency118.4
112.3Defensive Efficiency117.0
-16.7Net Efficiency1.4
-2.7Strength of Schedule0.1
-6.9Last 10 Net Efficiency1.5
70.2Tempo71.4
46.7%Effective FG%56.6%
21.1%Turnover Rate14.8%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
42.0%Free Throw Rate37.6%
-11.7Average Margin0.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Queens University HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY94.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–30.5), offensive efficiency (118.4–95.6), net efficiency (1.4–-16.7), strength of schedule (0.1–-2.7).
South Carolina State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (112.3–117.0), offensive rebounding (31.7–29.6), free throw rate (42.0–37.6).
Final
South Carolina State logo
South Carolina State
78—102
Queens University logo
Queens University
Queens University by 24 • 71.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

South Carolina StateTEAM STATQueens University
29-68FG33-66
43.0%FG%50.0%
8-183PT14-39
44.0%3PT%36.0%
12-18FT22-29
67.0%FT%76.0%
40Rebounds38
18Offensive Rebounds15
20Assists24
14Turnovers6
3Steals9
1Blocks9
21Fouls18

Player Box Score

South Carolina State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Owen Bronston Jr.G236-145-80-011000017
Jayden JohnsonG324-131-41-2111100010
Chris ParkerG252-110-06-6201100010
Florian TenebayG204-60-12-504000010
Cameron ClarkF214-90-00-08010008
Teon TindalC102-20-03-51000007
D'Shay Knights WrightF193-40-00-01100006
Noah TreadwellG182-62-50-01000006
Derwin Hodge Jr.F202-30-00-00101004
Tim OkojieC70-00-00-01100000
Rayniel WrightG50-00-00-01000000
Queens University
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nasir MannG286-92-39-1266210023
Carson SchwiegerF265-115-112-261100017
Yoav BermanG245-91-54-404320015
Chris AshbyG254-123-100-011000011
Avantae ParkerF223-31-13-454140010
Isaiah HenryG135-60-10-160100010
Jordan WatfordG231-31-32-32511005
Maban JabrielF172-41-20-11100005
Kam ClarkF62-30-10-02101004
Gus LarsonF130-30-02-26100002
Tyler CriderG20-30-20-00000000
Reid CelestinG10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

71.7Possessions71.7
108.8Offensive Efficiency142.3
142.3Defensive Efficiency108.8
-33.5Net Efficiency33.5
48.5%Effective FG%60.6%
50.9%True Shooting %63.9%
19.3%Turnover Rate8.5%
26.5%Free Throw Rate43.9%
26.5%3-Point Rate59.1%
1.43Assist / Turnover4.00
Game Summary
Queens University won by 24 points. The game played at approximately 71.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.