Hofstra logo

Hofstra

24-11
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
57.0%Hofstra
43.0%Syracuse
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -0.9
PROJECTED TOTAL146.5
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -133
Syracuse logo

Syracuse

15-16
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 74
Projected Total146.5
Projected ScoreSyracuse 73

Team Comparison

59.3MMH Power Index52.2
114.0Offensive Efficiency109.2
100.9Defensive Efficiency106.6
13.1Net Efficiency2.6
-2.9Strength of Schedule5.6
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-15.1
66.2Tempo69.0
52.2%Effective FG%52.9%
16.1%Turnover Rate15.6%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %29.0%
32.0%Free Throw Rate36.2%
8.7Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–52.2), offensive efficiency (114.0–109.2), defensive efficiency (100.9–106.6), net efficiency (13.1–2.6).
Syracuse COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.6–-2.9), shooting efficiency (52.9–52.2), ball security (15.6–16.1).
Final
Hofstra logo
Hofstra
70—69
Syracuse logo
Syracuse
Hofstra by 1 • 58.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HofstraTEAM STATSyracuse
26-53FG26-57
49.0%FG%46.0%
12-183PT8-23
67.0%3PT%35.0%
6-6FT9-16
100.0%FT%56.0%
27Rebounds34
8Offensive Rebounds15
13Assists15
10Turnovers9
6Steals5
5Blocks9
15Fouls11

Player Box Score

Hofstra
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cruz DavisG408-142-24-439010022
Preston EdmeadG284-94-60-001000012
Jaeden RobertsG124-53-40-021100011
German PlotnikovG403-63-40-02030009
Victory OnuetuF343-80-00-011104006
Biggie PattersonG221-50-12-23100004
Joshua DeCadyF182-40-10-02010004
Silas SundayF61-20-00-03010002
Syracuse
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
J.J. StarlingG346-152-41-232000015
William Kyle IIIF335-60-03-461140013
Nate KingzG344-94-90-052000012
Kiyan AnthonyG245-111-31-232110012
Sadiq White Jr.F234-70-04-871120012
Tyler BetseyF202-51-40-01102005
Naithan GeorgeG220-40-30-01620000
Ibrahim SouareF70-00-00-01000000
Bryce ZephirG30-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

58.3Possessions58.3
120.1Offensive Efficiency118.4
118.4Defensive Efficiency120.1
1.7Net Efficiency-1.7
60.4%Effective FG%52.6%
62.7%True Shooting %53.4%
17.3%Turnover Rate15.4%
11.3%Free Throw Rate28.1%
34.0%3-Point Rate40.4%
1.30Assist / Turnover1.67
Game Summary
Hofstra won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 58.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.