
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
57.0%Hofstra
43.0%Syracuse
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -0.9
PROJECTED TOTAL146.5
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -133

Syracuse
15-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 74
Projected Total146.5
Projected ScoreSyracuse 73
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index52.2
114.0Offensive Efficiency109.2
100.9Defensive Efficiency106.6
13.1Net Efficiency2.6
-2.9Strength of Schedule5.6
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-15.1
66.2Tempo69.0
52.2%Effective FG%52.9%
16.1%Turnover Rate15.6%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %29.0%
32.0%Free Throw Rate36.2%
8.7Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY57.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–52.2), offensive efficiency (114.0–109.2), defensive efficiency (100.9–106.6), net efficiency (13.1–2.6).
Syracuse COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.6–-2.9), shooting efficiency (52.9–52.2), ball security (15.6–16.1).