
Rutgers
13-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
14.7%Rutgers
85.3%Seton Hall
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSeton Hall -13.2
PROJECTED TOTAL140.5
MODEL MONEYLINESeton Hall -580

Seton Hall
21-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRutgers 64
Projected Total140.5
Projected ScoreSeton Hall 77
Team Comparison
45.9MMH Power Index57.1
104.2Offensive Efficiency105.8
112.2Defensive Efficiency98.3
-8.0Net Efficiency7.5
3.9Strength of Schedule3.5
-1.6Last 10 Net Efficiency0.6
67.4Tempo66.5
47.4%Effective FG%47.9%
15.0%Turnover Rate16.7%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %34.8%
36.3%Free Throw Rate35.7%
-5.4Average Margin5.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Seton Hall HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY85.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSeton Hall holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.1–45.9), offensive efficiency (105.8–104.2), defensive efficiency (98.3–112.2), net efficiency (7.5–-8.0).
Rutgers COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.9–3.5), ball security (15.0–16.7), free throw rate (36.3–35.7).