
SMU
20-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
60.2%SMU
39.8%LSU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -1.4
PROJECTED TOTAL165.6
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -151

LSU
15-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSMU 84
Projected Total165.6
Projected ScoreLSU 82
Team Comparison
62.5MMH Power Index54.2
118.2Offensive Efficiency115.5
109.6Defensive Efficiency111.3
8.6Net Efficiency4.2
7.0Strength of Schedule4.5
-1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-12.8
71.1Tempo70.5
55.7%Effective FG%53.4%
15.7%Turnover Rate15.6%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
31.3%Free Throw Rate41.9%
6.1Average Margin2.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
SMU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–54.2), offensive efficiency (118.2–115.5), defensive efficiency (109.6–111.3), net efficiency (8.6–4.2).
LSU COUNTERS WITHball security (15.6–15.7), free throw rate (41.9–31.3).