
Troy
22-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
30.6%Troy
69.4%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -5.5
PROJECTED TOTAL155.4
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -227

UAB
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTroy 75
Projected Total155.4
Projected ScoreUAB 80
Team Comparison
54.1MMH Power Index56.9
112.6Offensive Efficiency110.5
103.9Defensive Efficiency102.9
8.7Net Efficiency7.6
-2.2Strength of Schedule0.4
2.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
70.4Tempo71.7
52.1%Effective FG%48.8%
17.1%Turnover Rate12.4%
35.3%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
36.8%Free Throw Rate36.9%
6.1Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–54.1), defensive efficiency (102.9–103.9), strength of schedule (0.4–-2.2), recent form (2.9–2.0).
Troy COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (112.6–110.5), net efficiency (8.7–7.6), shooting efficiency (52.1–48.8).