Jacksonville

12-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

10.8%Jacksonville

89.2%Texas A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -14.0

PROJECTED TOTAL153.0

MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M -826

Texas A&M

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreJacksonville 69

Projected Total153.0

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 84

Team Comparison

JacksonvilleMetricTexas A&M

43.6MMH Power Index58

109.8Offensive Efficiency116.1

110.3Defensive Efficiency108.4

-0.5Net Efficiency7.7

-4.8Strength of Schedule4.8

-3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2

66.6Tempo69.1

51.7%Effective FG%53.5%

16.9%Turnover Rate14.8%

33.6%Offensive Rebound %31.7%

33.9%Free Throw Rate37.5%

-0.3Average Margin5.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–43.6), offensive efficiency (116.1–109.8), defensive efficiency (108.4–110.3), net efficiency (7.7–-0.5).

Jacksonville COUNTERS WITHrecent form (-3.2–-7.2), offensive rebounding (33.6–31.7).

Final

Jacksonville

75—112

Texas A&M

Texas A&M by 37 • 76.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

JacksonvilleTEAM STATTexas A&M

26-58FG42-71

45.0%FG%59.0%

9-273PT12-25

33.0%3PT%48.0%

14-17FT16-23

82.0%FT%70.0%

25Rebounds42

9Offensive Rebounds17

16Assists27

19Turnovers12

10Steals13

5Blocks4

18Fouls17

Player Box Score

Jacksonville

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jason Thirdkill Jr.	F	21	6-8	2-3	5-7	3	1	2	2	19
Hayden Wood	G	26	5-7	2-4	0-0	5	2	2	1	12
Chris Lockett Jr.	G	26	4-9	1-4	2-2	0	2	1	0	11
Chris Arias	G	14	3-7	2-6	1-2	2	1	0	0	9
Donovan Rivers	F	19	3-5	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	1	6
Jaylen Jones	G	25	1-6	0-1	2-2	0	4	0	0	4
Charles Caporaso	C	21	0-2	0-0	4-4	4	0	1	1	4
Michael Harper Jr.	G	9	2-3	0-0	0-0	2	2	1	0	4
Evan Sterck	G	20	1-4	1-3	0-0	0	1	2	0	3
Enrico Borio	F	19	1-7	1-6	0-0	6	3	1	0	3

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rylan Griffen	G	17	7-8	5-6	0-0	1	1	1	1	19
Jamie Vinson	F	11	6-6	1-1	1-3	2	0	0	1	14
Mackenzie Mgbako	F	19	4-10	0-4	5-7	8	2	2	0	13
Marcus Hill	G	21	5-7	0-1	2-2	5	5	2	0	12
Rubén Dominguez	G	21	4-9	2-7	0-0	2	2	0	0	10
Ali Dibba	G	13	4-8	1-1	1-2	4	1	1	0	10
Rashaun Agee	F	16	3-5	1-1	2-2	4	2	2	0	9
Federiko Federiko	F	10	2-2	0-0	2-4	1	0	1	1	6
Josh Holloway	G	17	1-3	0-0	3-3	4	3	1	0	5
Pop Isaacs	G	18	2-5	0-1	0-0	3	2	2	0	4
Jacari Lane	G	17	1-1	1-1	0-0	2	5	1	0	3
Noah Shelby	G	3	1-2	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Zach Clemence	F	10	1-3	0-0	0-0	2	2	0	0	2
Chris McDermott	F	3	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	1	2
Jeremiah Green	G	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

76.5Possessions76.5

98.0Offensive Efficiency146.4

146.4Defensive Efficiency98.0

-48.4Net Efficiency48.4

52.6%Effective FG%67.6%

56.8%True Shooting %68.4%

25.0%Turnover Rate15.6%

29.3%Free Throw Rate32.4%

46.6%3-Point Rate35.2%

0.84Assist / Turnover2.25

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 37 points. The game played at approximately 76.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.