
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
23.7%Queens University
76.3%Wake Forest
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWake Forest -8.4
PROJECTED TOTAL166.9
MODEL MONEYLINEWake Forest -322

Wake Forest
18-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 79
Projected Total166.9
Projected ScoreWake Forest 88
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index57.6
118.4Offensive Efficiency112.4
117.0Defensive Efficiency109.7
1.4Net Efficiency2.7
0.1Strength of Schedule7.2
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.1
71.4Tempo70.2
56.6%Effective FG%52.8%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.5%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %30.0%
37.6%Free Throw Rate36.1%
0.9Average Margin1.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Wake Forest HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY76.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWake Forest holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.6–51.7), defensive efficiency (109.7–117.0), net efficiency (2.7–1.4), strength of schedule (7.2–0.1).
Queens University COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (118.4–112.4), recent form (1.5–-0.1), shooting efficiency (56.6–52.8).