
Texas A&M
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
23.7%Texas A&M
76.3%Kentucky
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKentucky -7.9
PROJECTED TOTAL158.2
MODEL MONEYLINEKentucky -322

Kentucky
22-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 75
Projected Total158.2
Projected ScoreKentucky 83
Team Comparison
58MMH Power Index63.9
116.1Offensive Efficiency115.2
108.4Defensive Efficiency106.3
7.7Net Efficiency8.9
4.8Strength of Schedule8.7
-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0
69.1Tempo69.9
53.5%Effective FG%53.2%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.4%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
37.5%Free Throw Rate38.0%
5.3Average Margin6.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kentucky HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY76.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKentucky holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–58.0), defensive efficiency (106.3–108.4), net efficiency (8.9–7.7), strength of schedule (8.7–4.8).
Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (116.1–115.2), shooting efficiency (53.5–53.2), ball security (14.8–15.4).