Miami (OH)

32-2

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

47.3%Miami (OH)

52.7%Wright State

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWright State -0.3

PROJECTED TOTAL164.0

MODEL MONEYLINEWright State -111

Wright State

23-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMiami (OH) 82

Projected Total164.0

Projected ScoreWright State 82

Team Comparison

Miami (OH)MetricWright State

60.7MMH Power Index57.1

123.1Offensive Efficiency116.4

103.7Defensive Efficiency106.5

19.4Net Efficiency9.9

-5.6Strength of Schedule-2.0

5.5Last 10 Net Efficiency7.0

72.8Tempo69.2

60.6%Effective FG%55.2%

14.2%Turnover Rate16.1%

26.3%Offensive Rebound %33.9%

40.1%Free Throw Rate38.3%

14.1Average Margin6.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Miami (OH) HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami (OH) holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (60.7–57.1), offensive efficiency (123.1–116.4), defensive efficiency (103.7–106.5), net efficiency (19.4–9.9).

Wright State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.0–-5.6), recent form (7.0–5.5), offensive rebounding (33.9–26.3).

Final

Miami (OH)

83—76

Wright State

Miami (OH) by 7 • 72.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Miami (OH)TEAM STATWright State

28-51FG27-63

55.0%FG%43.0%

10-193PT3-21

53.0%3PT%14.0%

17-28FT19-24

61.0%FT%79.0%

30Rebounds38

3Offensive Rebounds12

13Assists10

11Turnovers10

6Steals8

2Blocks3

18Fouls23

Player Box Score

Miami (OH)

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Brant Byers	G	32	8-11	5-6	6-12	5	0	3	0	27
Evan Ipsaro	G	34	5-12	0-1	2-2	1	3	1	0	12
Peter Suder	G	28	5-6	0-0	0-1	3	3	0	0	10
Almar Atlason	F	20	3-6	1-4	3-5	4	1	0	1	10
Eian Elmer	G	31	2-4	2-4	3-4	6	1	0	0	9
Luke Skaljac	G	22	3-6	2-4	1-2	1	2	1	0	9
Antwone Woolfolk	F	22	2-5	0-0	2-2	6	2	1	1	6
Trey Perry	G	11	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Wright State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Michael Cooper	G	35	8-17	1-5	4-4	6	2	2	0	21
Michael Imariagbe	F	22	5-6	0-0	6-8	7	1	0	1	16
Logan Woods	G	27	3-11	1-7	2-4	4	0	2	0	9
Dominic Pangonis	G	27	4-8	1-2	0-0	4	0	0	0	9
TJ Burch	G	21	1-6	0-1	4-4	1	3	2	0	6
Andrea Holden	F	14	2-2	0-0	2-2	4	0	1	2	6
Sam Alamutu	G	16	2-5	0-1	1-2	2	2	0	0	5
Bryan Etumnu	F	6	2-4	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
Solomon Callaghan	G	25	0-3	0-3	0-0	4	2	1	0	0
Kellen Pickett	F	5	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Alex Bruskotter	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

72.4Possessions72.4

114.6Offensive Efficiency105.0

105.0Defensive Efficiency114.6

9.7Net Efficiency-9.7

64.7%Effective FG%45.2%

64.5%True Shooting %51.1%

15.2%Turnover Rate13.8%

54.9%Free Throw Rate38.1%

37.3%3-Point Rate33.3%

1.18Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Miami (OH) won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 72.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.