UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

68.9%UT Rio Grande Valley

31.1%Lamar

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -3.4

PROJECTED TOTAL142.3

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -222

Lamar

12-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 73

Projected Total142.3

Projected ScoreLamar 69

Team Comparison

UT Rio Grande ValleyMetricLamar

55.8MMH Power Index44.1

112.6Offensive Efficiency105.0

103.1Defensive Efficiency103.8

9.5Net Efficiency1.2

-1.9Strength of Schedule-3.0

12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.2

67.4Tempo66.6

55.7%Effective FG%48.8%

17.9%Turnover Rate18.0%

29.2%Offensive Rebound %35.5%

29.6%Free Throw Rate28.5%

6.4Average Margin0.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY68.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–44.1), offensive efficiency (112.6–105.0), defensive efficiency (103.1–103.8), net efficiency (9.5–1.2).

Lamar COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (35.5–29.2).

Final

UT Rio Grande Valley

83—72

Lamar

UT Rio Grande Valley by 11 • 70.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT Rio Grande ValleyTEAM STATLamar

30-58FG24-59

52.0%FG%41.0%

14-253PT9-28

56.0%3PT%32.0%

9-13FT15-21

69.0%FT%71.0%

35Rebounds36

6Offensive Rebounds11

15Assists16

11Turnovers13

6Steals7

1Blocks4

17Fouls16

Player Box Score

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Marvin McGhee III	G	31	6-11	6-9	0-0	7	3	2	0	18
Filip Brankovic	F	23	8-13	2-3	0-0	8	4	1	0	18
Koree Cotton	G	32	3-10	1-3	3-4	9	0	1	0	10
Julien Gomez	G	21	4-7	2-4	0-0	3	0	0	0	10
Always Wright	G	29	3-5	0-1	3-4	3	4	1	0	9
Jaylen Washington	G	13	3-4	0-0	2-3	0	1	1	0	8
Zae Blake	G	24	1-5	1-3	1-2	2	2	0	0	4
Kwo Agwa	F	17	1-2	1-1	0-0	1	0	0	1	3
Dane Christensen	F	4	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Jalen Ricks	G	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Demarris Winters	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Lamar

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Andrew Holifield	F	29	7-20	3-10	7-7	3	2	1	0	24
Cody Pennebaker	G	26	7-9	2-2	0-0	8	5	2	1	16
Rob Lee Jr.	G	25	4-10	1-6	3-4	0	0	0	0	12
Braden East	F	24	2-4	1-2	2-6	8	2	1	1	7
Eian Lowe	G	20	1-2	0-1	3-4	2	3	2	0	5
King-Njhsanni Wilhite	G	20	1-4	1-3	0-0	0	3	0	0	3
Jayden Gambrell	G	10	1-4	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Errol White	F	27	1-4	0-0	0-0	8	0	1	0	2
Janko Bulajic	C	16	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	2	0
B.B. Knight	G	3	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.1Possessions70.1

118.4Offensive Efficiency102.7

102.7Defensive Efficiency118.4

15.7Net Efficiency-15.7

63.8%Effective FG%48.3%

64.7%True Shooting %52.2%

15.9%Turnover Rate18.3%

22.4%Free Throw Rate35.6%

43.1%3-Point Rate47.5%

1.36Assist / Turnover1.23

Game Summary

UT Rio Grande Valley won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 70.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.