
Longwood
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
15.6%Longwood
84.4%Wake Forest
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWake Forest -10.0
PROJECTED TOTAL156.9
MODEL MONEYLINEWake Forest -541

Wake Forest
18-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLongwood 73
Projected Total156.9
Projected ScoreWake Forest 83
Team Comparison
47MMH Power Index57.6
108.1Offensive Efficiency112.4
103.0Defensive Efficiency109.7
5.1Net Efficiency2.7
-6.4Strength of Schedule7.2
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.1
71.9Tempo70.2
51.4%Effective FG%52.8%
19.3%Turnover Rate15.5%
35.4%Offensive Rebound %30.0%
42.0%Free Throw Rate36.1%
3.6Average Margin1.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Longwood HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY84.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLongwood holds the advantage in defensive efficiency (103.0–109.7), net efficiency (5.1–2.7), recent form (2.3–-0.1), offensive rebounding (35.4–30.0).
Wake Forest COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (57.6–47.0), offensive efficiency (112.4–108.1), strength of schedule (7.2–-6.4).