Binghamton

8-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

7.4%Binghamton

92.6%Pittsburgh

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPittsburgh -16.1

PROJECTED TOTAL139.5

MODEL MONEYLINEPittsburgh -1251

Pittsburgh

13-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBinghamton 62

Projected Total139.5

Projected ScorePittsburgh 78

Team Comparison

BinghamtonMetricPittsburgh

32.4MMH Power Index50.5

102.2Offensive Efficiency108.4

112.3Defensive Efficiency110.4

-10.1Net Efficiency-2.0

-6.0Strength of Schedule5.5

-6.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.9

64.2Tempo65.0

51.3%Effective FG%51.4%

18.5%Turnover Rate17.3%

21.5%Offensive Rebound %33.1%

42.8%Free Throw Rate31.2%

-6.5Average Margin-1.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Pittsburgh HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPittsburgh holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.5–32.4), offensive efficiency (108.4–102.2), defensive efficiency (110.4–112.3), net efficiency (-2.0–-10.1).

Binghamton COUNTERS WITHrecent form (-6.2–-6.9), free throw rate (42.8–31.2).

Final

Binghamton

63—103

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh by 40 • 71.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BinghamtonTEAM STATPittsburgh

18-41FG36-58

44.0%FG%62.0%

6-103PT16-27

60.0%3PT%59.0%

21-27FT15-24

78.0%FT%63.0%

26Rebounds29

5Offensive Rebounds8

9Assists20

22Turnovers11

7Steals14

2Blocks5

18Fouls22

Player Box Score

Binghamton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Demetrius Lilley	C	34	4-9	0-0	5-6	11	1	1	0	13
Jeremiah Quigley	G	33	2-7	0-1	8-10	1	4	1	0	12
Jake Blackburn	G	22	4-4	4-4	0-0	0	0	0	0	12
Bryson Wilson	G	24	2-3	0-1	6-8	4	1	0	0	10
Zyier Beverly	F	19	3-7	0-0	2-3	3	0	1	1	8
Wes Peterson Jr.	G	35	2-6	1-1	0-0	4	2	1	0	5
Jackson Benigni	G	24	1-4	1-3	0-0	1	1	3	0	3
Stephan Snagg	F	8	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0
Nevin Ibroci	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Pittsburgh

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Barry Dunning Jr.	G	24	7-9	5-7	4-5	1	1	1	3	23
Brandin Cummings	G	21	5-9	3-6	4-6	2	4	1	1	17
Nojus Indrusaitis	G	34	5-11	3-7	3-5	4	5	4	0	16
Cameron Corhen	F	25	6-10	1-1	1-2	6	2	3	0	14
Roman Siulepa	F	31	5-6	0-1	2-4	4	0	1	1	12
Omari Witherspoon	G	17	4-6	2-2	1-2	3	0	1	0	11
Macari Moore	G	8	3-4	1-1	0-0	0	1	2	0	7
Damarco Minor	G	23	1-2	1-2	0-0	3	7	1	0	3
Kieran Mullen	C	17	0-1	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.6Possessions71.6

88.0Offensive Efficiency143.9

143.9Defensive Efficiency88.0

-55.9Net Efficiency55.9

51.2%Effective FG%75.9%

58.5%True Shooting %74.2%

31.1%Turnover Rate15.2%

65.9%Free Throw Rate41.4%

24.4%3-Point Rate46.6%

0.41Assist / Turnover1.82

Game Summary

Pittsburgh won by 40 points. The game played at approximately 71.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.