
Cleveland State
11-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
6.3%Cleveland State
93.7%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -18.4
PROJECTED TOTAL163.7
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -1487

UAB
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCleveland State 73
Projected Total163.7
Projected ScoreUAB 91
Team Comparison
37.3MMH Power Index56.9
111.6Offensive Efficiency110.5
120.2Defensive Efficiency102.9
-8.6Net Efficiency7.6
-1.7Strength of Schedule0.4
-14.6Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
71.5Tempo71.7
55.0%Effective FG%48.8%
18.0%Turnover Rate12.4%
28.6%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
38.7%Free Throw Rate36.9%
-6.2Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY93.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–37.3), defensive efficiency (102.9–120.2), net efficiency (7.6–-8.6), strength of schedule (0.4–-1.7).
Cleveland State COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (111.6–110.5), shooting efficiency (55.0–48.8), free throw rate (38.7–36.9).