UTSA

5-25

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

7.6%UTSA

92.4%USC

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUSC -17.3

PROJECTED TOTAL156.2

MODEL MONEYLINEUSC -1216

USC

18-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUTSA 69

Projected Total156.2

Projected ScoreUSC 87

Team Comparison

UTSAMetricUSC

30.5MMH Power Index48.3

99.0Offensive Efficiency108.5

115.0Defensive Efficiency107.6

-16.0Net Efficiency0.9

-1.2Strength of Schedule2.5

-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-16.0

70.2Tempo72.4

45.9%Effective FG%50.7%

17.0%Turnover Rate17.2%

30.9%Offensive Rebound %33.2%

29.9%Free Throw Rate45.3%

-11.3Average Margin0.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

USC HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUSC holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.3–30.5), offensive efficiency (108.5–99.0), defensive efficiency (107.6–115.0), net efficiency (0.9–-16.0).

UTSA COUNTERS WITHball security (17.0–17.2).

Final

UTSA

70—97

USC

USC by 27 • 74.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UTSATEAM STATUSC

22-63FG33-60

35.0%FG%55.0%

7-273PT9-23

26.0%3PT%39.0%

19-23FT22-28

83.0%FT%79.0%

34Rebounds33

17Offensive Rebounds10

12Assists18

17Turnovers11

9Steals12

3Blocks6

20Fouls19

Player Box Score

UTSA

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Brent Moss	G	32	6-12	1-3	3-5	4	2	2	0	16
Jamir Simpson	G	32	5-14	1-5	5-7	4	3	2	0	16
Kaidon Rayfield	F	30	5-9	2-5	2-2	3	0	3	2	14
Dorian Hayes	G	34	2-11	2-8	0-0	1	5	2	0	6
Macaleab Rich	G	18	1-6	0-2	4-4	2	1	0	0	6
Mo Njie	C	10	1-1	1-1	2-2	3	0	0	1	5
Daniel Akitoby	F	16	1-4	0-0	2-2	7	0	0	0	4
Baboucarr Njie	F	13	1-4	0-1	1-1	4	1	0	0	3
Matheo Coffi	F	15	0-2	0-2	0-0	4	0	0	0	0

USC

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ezra Ausar	F	32	9-13	0-0	4-6	10	3	1	1	22
Chad Baker-Mazara	G	36	5-13	2-8	8-9	5	5	1	1	20
Ryan Cornish	G	28	6-10	4-8	2-2	3	3	2	1	18
Jacob Cofie	F	20	5-6	0-0	2-2	2	1	3	2	12
Jordan Marsh	G	33	4-8	2-4	1-3	1	2	3	0	11
Jaden Brownell	F	14	2-4	0-2	2-2	3	1	0	1	6
Terrance Williams II	F	29	1-2	1-1	1-2	4	3	1	0	4
Jerry Easter II	G	8	1-4	0-0	2-2	2	0	1	0	4

Advanced Game Stats

74.1Possessions74.1

94.5Offensive Efficiency130.9

130.9Defensive Efficiency94.5

-36.4Net Efficiency36.4

40.5%Effective FG%62.5%

47.3%True Shooting %66.2%

23.0%Turnover Rate14.8%

36.5%Free Throw Rate46.7%

42.9%3-Point Rate38.3%

0.71Assist / Turnover1.64

Game Summary

USC won by 27 points. The game played at approximately 74.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.