Sam Houston logo

Sam Houston

22-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
58.4%Sam Houston
41.6%Oregon State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSam Houston -2.5
PROJECTED TOTAL153.5
MODEL MONEYLINESam Houston -140
Oregon State logo

Oregon State

17-16
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSam Houston 78
Projected Total153.5
Projected ScoreOregon State 76

Team Comparison

56.1MMH Power Index48.5
115.5Offensive Efficiency105.8
105.5Defensive Efficiency110.3
10.0Net Efficiency-4.5
-2.2Strength of Schedule4.5
3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency0.0
71.2Tempo67.2
53.2%Effective FG%50.6%
16.6%Turnover Rate17.7%
37.4%Offensive Rebound %26.4%
34.8%Free Throw Rate43.9%
7.1Average Margin-3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Sam Houston HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY58.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSam Houston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–48.5), offensive efficiency (115.5–105.8), defensive efficiency (105.5–110.3), net efficiency (10.0–-4.5).
Oregon State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.5–-2.2), free throw rate (43.9–34.8).
Final
Sam Houston logo
Sam Houston
85—75
Oregon State logo
Oregon State
Sam Houston by 10 • 74.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Sam HoustonTEAM STATOregon State
29-65FG26-59
45.0%FG%44.0%
10-273PT9-34
37.0%3PT%26.0%
17-23FT14-19
74.0%FT%74.0%
46Rebounds26
15Offensive Rebounds4
18Assists13
13Turnovers11
8Steals7
1Blocks2
20Fouls20

Player Box Score

Sam Houston
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kashie NattG275-83-36-851010019
Po'Boigh KingG346-113-73-343100018
Veljko IlicF337-140-11-4123200015
Isaiah ManningF193-92-54-482000012
Damon Nicholas Jr.G315-90-20-072300010
Justin BeggG262-62-40-01610006
Jacob WalkerG180-40-33-42100003
Matt DannF41-10-00-02010002
CJ BeaumontG60-30-20-02000000
Jaxson FordF20-00-00-00000000
Oregon State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Josiah Lake IIG386-80-17-944210019
Keziah EkissiG234-83-62-212200013
Dez WhiteG284-143-110-022000011
Isaiah SyF263-73-60-13200009
Noah AmenhauserC184-40-01-15111009
Yaak YaakC202-50-02-42120006
Jorge Diaz GrahamF182-40-22-25000006
Ja'Quavis WillifordG71-30-20-02000002
Olavi SuutelaF70-00-00-00100000
Matija SamarG70-30-30-01000000
Malcolm ChristieG50-30-30-01000000
Stephen OlowoniyiF30-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

74.5Possessions74.5
114.1Offensive Efficiency100.7
100.7Defensive Efficiency114.1
13.4Net Efficiency-13.4
52.3%Effective FG%51.7%
56.0%True Shooting %55.1%
17.6%Turnover Rate14.7%
35.4%Free Throw Rate32.2%
41.5%3-Point Rate57.6%
1.38Assist / Turnover1.18
Game Summary
Sam Houston won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 74.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.