UT Arlington

18-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

17.1%UT Arlington

82.9%Stanford

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADStanford -9.1

PROJECTED TOTAL143.0

MODEL MONEYLINEStanford -485

Stanford

20-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Arlington 67

Projected Total143.0

Projected ScoreStanford 76

Team Comparison

UT ArlingtonMetricStanford

49.6MMH Power Index59.2

102.7Offensive Efficiency111.6

97.9Defensive Efficiency107.1

4.8Net Efficiency4.5

-0.8Strength of Schedule5.2

-3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency7.4

68.1Tempo68.1

48.5%Effective FG%51.9%

20.4%Turnover Rate15.5%

36.0%Offensive Rebound %32.4%

43.7%Free Throw Rate37.2%

3.3Average Margin3.0

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Stanford HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY82.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStanford holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.2–49.6), offensive efficiency (111.6–102.7), strength of schedule (5.2–-0.8), recent form (7.4–-3.9).

UT Arlington COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (97.9–107.1), net efficiency (4.8–4.5), offensive rebounding (36.0–32.4).

Final

UT Arlington

60—76

Stanford

Stanford by 16 • 67.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT ArlingtonTEAM STATStanford

18-43FG23-48

42.0%FG%48.0%

4-143PT5-15

29.0%3PT%33.0%

20-29FT25-32

69.0%FT%78.0%

23Rebounds32

4Offensive Rebounds7

6Assists13

14Turnovers12

4Steals7

1Blocks1

24Fouls21

Player Box Score

UT Arlington

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Cash Chavis	G	34	4-10	1-2	5-7	2	4	2	1	14
Marcell McCreary	G	30	4-11	1-5	3-3	5	0	2	0	12
Amari Reed	F	19	3-3	0-0	3-6	5	0	0	0	9
Bahsil Laster	G	27	1-3	0-2	6-8	1	0	0	0	8
Marcus Rigsby Jr.	G	23	3-5	2-4	0-0	1	1	0	0	8
Raysean Seamster	F	30	2-7	0-0	3-5	3	0	0	0	7
Cameron Jackson	F	18	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Tyran Mason	G	11	0-2	0-1	0-0	4	1	0	0	0
Jordan Lowery	G	7	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Alex Bossinakis	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Stanford

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Benny Gealer	G	39	4-11	2-7	7-7	3	2	3	0	17
Chisom Okpara	F	33	5-9	0-1	7-8	3	3	1	0	17
AJ Rohosy	F	24	5-8	0-0	3-9	7	1	0	1	13
Jeremy Dent-Smith	G	32	2-7	2-5	4-4	2	5	1	0	10
Ryan Agarwal	G	27	4-6	1-2	0-0	4	1	0	0	9
Aidan Cammann	F	19	2-3	0-0	2-2	5	1	0	0	6
Jaylen Thompson	F	14	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	2	0	2
Oskar Giltay	F	8	0-2	0-0	2-2	3	0	0	0	2
Kristers Skrinda	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.5Possessions67.5

88.9Offensive Efficiency112.6

112.6Defensive Efficiency88.9

-23.7Net Efficiency23.7

46.5%Effective FG%53.1%

52.8%True Shooting %60.1%

21.0%Turnover Rate17.6%

67.4%Free Throw Rate66.7%

32.6%3-Point Rate31.3%

0.43Assist / Turnover1.08

Game Summary

Stanford won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 67.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.