
Tulsa
30-8GAME THAT MATTERSAT
62.6%Tulsa
37.4%Western Kentucky
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -3.0
PROJECTED TOTAL160.8
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -167

Western Kentucky
18-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulsa 82
Projected Total160.8
Projected ScoreWestern Kentucky 79
Team Comparison
64.8MMH Power Index55.6
121.1Offensive Efficiency110.6
104.8Defensive Efficiency106.2
16.3Net Efficiency4.4
0.0Strength of Schedule1.7
10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency5.2
70.2Tempo71.7
55.4%Effective FG%48.6%
15.4%Turnover Rate14.5%
33.8%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
42.4%Free Throw Rate42.9%
11.5Average Margin3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY62.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–55.6), offensive efficiency (121.1–110.6), defensive efficiency (104.8–106.2), net efficiency (16.3–4.4).
Western Kentucky COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–0.0), ball security (14.5–15.4), free throw rate (42.9–42.4).