
Binghamton
8-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.3%Binghamton
87.7%Mercyhurst
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMercyhurst -13.6
PROJECTED TOTAL136.1
MODEL MONEYLINEMercyhurst -713

Mercyhurst
17-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBinghamton 61
Projected Total136.1
Projected ScoreMercyhurst 75
Team Comparison
32.4MMH Power Index45.5
102.2Offensive Efficiency105.2
112.3Defensive Efficiency102.2
-10.1Net Efficiency3.0
-6.0Strength of Schedule-5.7
-6.2Last 10 Net Efficiency3.2
64.2Tempo65.9
51.3%Effective FG%50.5%
18.5%Turnover Rate14.4%
21.5%Offensive Rebound %26.8%
42.8%Free Throw Rate25.4%
-6.5Average Margin2.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Mercyhurst HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY87.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMercyhurst holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.5–32.4), offensive efficiency (105.2–102.2), defensive efficiency (102.2–112.3), net efficiency (3.0–-10.1).
Binghamton COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.3–50.5), free throw rate (42.8–25.4).