Holy Cross

11-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

10.5%Holy Cross

89.5%Harvard

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHarvard -14.4

PROJECTED TOTAL138.5

MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -852

Harvard

17-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHoly Cross 62

Projected Total138.5

Projected ScoreHarvard 76

Team Comparison

Holy CrossMetricHarvard

37.9MMH Power Index52.6

103.3Offensive Efficiency108.1

110.9Defensive Efficiency102.9

-7.6Net Efficiency5.2

-2.6Strength of Schedule-0.1

-5.2Last 10 Net Efficiency8.3

66.1Tempo64.8

49.8%Effective FG%53.4%

15.4%Turnover Rate17.2%

22.4%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

32.5%Free Throw Rate27.9%

-5.1Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Harvard HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–37.9), offensive efficiency (108.1–103.3), defensive efficiency (102.9–110.9), net efficiency (5.2–-7.6).

Holy Cross COUNTERS WITHball security (15.4–17.2), free throw rate (32.5–27.9).

Final

Holy Cross

53—81

Harvard

Harvard by 28 • 61.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Holy CrossTEAM STATHarvard

20-60FG31-52

33.0%FG%60.0%

6-303PT7-14

20.0%3PT%50.0%

7-9FT12-15

78.0%FT%80.0%

25Rebounds38

11Offensive Rebounds8

9Assists15

7Turnovers11

6Steals3

1Blocks7

13Fouls10

Player Box Score

Holy Cross

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Gabe Warren	G	33	5-11	0-3	6-8	4	1	3	0	16
Joe Nugent	G	33	4-11	0-6	1-1	5	1	0	0	9
Tyler Boston	G	32	3-12	2-7	0-0	2	3	0	0	8
Aidan Richard	F	24	2-9	2-6	0-0	2	0	1	0	6
Jude Haigh	G	12	2-4	2-3	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
DeAndre Williams	G	19	1-6	0-2	0-0	1	2	1	0	2
John St. Germain III	G	17	1-2	0-1	0-0	1	2	1	0	2
Will Aljancic	F	13	1-3	0-1	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Chuck Hare	F	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Jaden Kirkwood	G	7	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Austin Mejia	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Harvard

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Austin Hunt	G	26	8-9	3-4	0-0	5	0	0	1	19
Tey Barbour	G	31	5-6	4-5	4-4	8	2	0	0	18
Chandler Pigge	G	30	7-12	0-2	2-3	7	3	1	2	16
Robert Hinton	G	27	5-9	0-0	6-8	7	1	1	0	16
Ben Eisendrath	G	19	3-3	0-0	0-0	1	4	1	1	6
Thomas Batties III	F	30	1-8	0-2	0-0	1	2	0	3	2
Ryan Sullivan	F	8	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	2
Xavier Nesbitt	G	7	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Frankie Mannino	G	13	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	2	0	0	0
Luca Ace-Nasteski	F	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Joseph Quartey	G	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Dutch Dowdell	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Payton Pitts	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Greg Cooper	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

61.2Possessions61.2

86.6Offensive Efficiency132.4

132.4Defensive Efficiency86.6

-45.8Net Efficiency45.8

38.3%Effective FG%66.3%

41.2%True Shooting %68.5%

11.6%Turnover Rate17.7%

15.0%Free Throw Rate28.8%

50.0%3-Point Rate26.9%

1.29Assist / Turnover1.36

Game Summary

Harvard won by 28 points. The game played at approximately 61.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.