UT Martin logo

UT Martin

22-11
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
53.4%UT Martin
46.6%Tennessee Tech
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Martin -1.5
PROJECTED TOTAL139.9
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Martin -115
Tennessee Tech logo

Tennessee Tech

13-18
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Martin 71
Projected Total139.9
Projected ScoreTennessee Tech 69

Team Comparison

49.8MMH Power Index44
103.8Offensive Efficiency105.4
94.0Defensive Efficiency107.0
9.8Net Efficiency-1.6
-4.8Strength of Schedule-3.8
-0.8Last 10 Net Efficiency4.4
67.2Tempo69.6
49.5%Effective FG%50.4%
21.4%Turnover Rate19.1%
37.9%Offensive Rebound %32.0%
37.5%Free Throw Rate37.2%
6.6Average Margin-1.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UT Martin HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY53.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Martin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.8–44.0), defensive efficiency (94.0–107.0), net efficiency (9.8–-1.6), offensive rebounding (37.9–32.0).
Tennessee Tech COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (105.4–103.8), strength of schedule (-3.8–-4.8), recent form (4.4–-0.8).
Final
UT Martin logo
UT Martin
86—62
Tennessee Tech logo
Tennessee Tech
UT Martin by 24 • 63.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT MartinTEAM STATTennessee Tech
31-58FG22-52
53.0%FG%42.0%
13-293PT9-29
45.0%3PT%31.0%
11-13FT9-12
85.0%FT%75.0%
32Rebounds29
8Offensive Rebounds9
19Assists13
7Turnovers15
9Steals5
1Blocks1
17Fouls14

Player Box Score

UT Martin
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Andrija BukumirovicF3012-153-61-240200028
Matas DeniusasF264-82-56-634100016
Luca ColceagF213-73-50-03001009
Damien KingG154-61-20-01020009
Filip RadakovicG303-91-20-05710007
Filip PetkovskiG272-32-31-11500007
Pedro SantosG152-40-20-03120004
Ty PriceG21-21-20-01000003
Vladimir KhryapaF80-00-02-21210002
Lamine NiangF140-20-01-23000001
AJ HopkinsF110-20-20-05000000
Ama SowF10-00-00-00000000
Tennessee Tech
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Mekhi CameronG277-93-52-331000019
Ty OwensG253-72-50-01201008
Brandon MuntuG272-70-42-21310006
C.J. McPhersonG212-41-30-02210005
Jah'Kim PayneG202-51-40-01200005
Dani PoundsF172-51-10-00110005
Malik FergusonG142-40-21-12000005
JaJuan NichollsF131-30-02-34000004
Ja'Quavian FlorenceG151-41-30-03110003
Mekhi TurnerF100-20-02-34110002
Grant SlattenG70-10-10-01000000
Owen VarnadoF20-00-00-00000000
Hagan PrestonG20-10-10-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

63.5Possessions63.5
135.4Offensive Efficiency97.6
97.6Defensive Efficiency135.4
37.8Net Efficiency-37.8
64.7%Effective FG%51.0%
67.0%True Shooting %53.7%
11.1%Turnover Rate23.5%
22.4%Free Throw Rate23.1%
50.0%3-Point Rate55.8%
2.71Assist / Turnover0.87
Game Summary
UT Martin won by 24 points. The game played at approximately 63.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.