
Pennsylvania
18-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
56.7%Pennsylvania
43.3%Rutgers
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPennsylvania -1.4
PROJECTED TOTAL149.6
MODEL MONEYLINEPennsylvania -131

Rutgers
13-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePennsylvania 76
Projected Total149.6
Projected ScoreRutgers 74
Team Comparison
52.9MMH Power Index45.9
108.6Offensive Efficiency104.2
106.4Defensive Efficiency112.2
2.2Net Efficiency-8.0
1.9Strength of Schedule3.9
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.6
69.9Tempo67.4
50.9%Effective FG%47.4%
15.4%Turnover Rate15.0%
31.1%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
36.3%Free Throw Rate36.3%
1.5Average Margin-5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Pennsylvania HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPennsylvania holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.9–45.9), offensive efficiency (108.6–104.2), defensive efficiency (106.4–112.2), net efficiency (2.2–-8.0).
Rutgers COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.9–1.9), ball security (15.0–15.4).