Rice

13-18

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

56.5%Rice

43.5%Pepperdine

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADRice -1.4

PROJECTED TOTAL152.2

MODEL MONEYLINERice -130

Pepperdine

9-23

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreRice 77

Projected Total152.2

Projected ScorePepperdine 75

Team Comparison

RiceMetricPepperdine

45.1MMH Power Index38.2

108.3Offensive Efficiency103.2

109.2Defensive Efficiency113.6

-0.9Net Efficiency-10.4

-2.2Strength of Schedule0.7

-4.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

68.3Tempo70.0

49.7%Effective FG%48.7%

17.8%Turnover Rate18.3%

35.7%Offensive Rebound %31.1%

34.7%Free Throw Rate34.0%

-0.6Average Margin-7.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Rice HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY56.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRice holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.1–38.2), offensive efficiency (108.3–103.2), defensive efficiency (109.2–113.6), net efficiency (-0.9–-10.4).

Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.7–-2.2).

Final

Rice

62—84

Pepperdine

Pepperdine by 22 • 70.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

RiceTEAM STATPepperdine

21-63FG29-59

33.0%FG%49.0%

5-203PT13-24

25.0%3PT%54.0%

15-22FT13-16

68.0%FT%81.0%

37Rebounds37

18Offensive Rebounds10

9Assists16

13Turnovers16

8Steals5

4Blocks3

16Fouls16

Player Box Score

Rice

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Trae Broadnax	G	32	6-14	2-6	5-6	8	0	2	0	19
Eternity Eguagie	F	16	3-9	0-0	3-3	1	0	0	0	9
Jalen Smith	G	32	2-7	1-5	3-4	3	4	1	0	8
Stephen Giwa	C	23	2-4	0-0	2-3	4	0	0	2	6
Jimmy Oladokun Jr.	F	14	2-7	0-0	2-6	6	0	0	1	6
Andrew Akuchie	F	13	3-3	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	0	6
Nick Anderson	G	32	1-11	1-6	0-0	3	1	2	1	3
Bodey Howell	G	21	1-5	1-2	0-0	1	0	1	0	3
Cam Carroll	G	12	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	3	0	0	2
Jordan Williams	G	5	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	1	1	0	0

Pepperdine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Aaron Clark	G	34	7-17	4-6	7-8	6	3	3	0	25
Javon Cooley	G	30	5-8	4-5	1-2	4	2	1	0	15
Danilo Dožic	C	28	4-9	2-5	0-0	1	3	0	0	10
Styles Phipps	G	34	3-8	0-2	2-2	3	6	0	1	8
Yonatan Levy	F	24	3-6	1-2	1-1	7	2	0	0	8
Stefan Cicic	C	15	3-3	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	1	7
David Mager	G	8	1-2	0-1	1-1	1	0	1	0	3
Luka Vudragovic	G	6	1-2	1-2	0-0	3	0	0	0	3
Vladimir Sudar	F	4	1-2	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Pavle Stošic	F	13	1-2	0-0	0-0	6	0	0	1	2
Pasha Shemirani	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.6Possessions70.6

87.8Offensive Efficiency119.0

119.0Defensive Efficiency87.8

-31.2Net Efficiency31.2

37.3%Effective FG%60.2%

42.2%True Shooting %63.1%

19.0%Turnover Rate22.0%

34.9%Free Throw Rate27.1%

31.7%3-Point Rate40.7%

0.69Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Pepperdine won by 22 points. The game played at approximately 70.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.