
UC Riverside
10-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.0%UC Riverside
93.0%St. Thomas-Minnesota
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSt. Thomas-Minnesota -17.6
PROJECTED TOTAL154.5
MODEL MONEYLINESt. Thomas-Minnesota -1329

St. Thomas-Minnesota
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUC Riverside 68
Projected Total154.5
Projected ScoreSt. Thomas-Minnesota 86
Team Comparison
41.2MMH Power Index59.8
103.1Offensive Efficiency116.8
110.1Defensive Efficiency102.2
-7.0Net Efficiency14.6
0.5Strength of Schedule-3.6
-5.1Last 10 Net Efficiency14.7
70.7Tempo70.0
49.8%Effective FG%59.2%
18.5%Turnover Rate13.9%
28.5%Offensive Rebound %22.1%
35.2%Free Throw Rate35.2%
-4.9Average Margin10.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
St. Thomas-Minnesota HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY93.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSt. Thomas-Minnesota holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.8–41.2), offensive efficiency (116.8–103.1), defensive efficiency (102.2–110.1), net efficiency (14.6–-7.0).
UC Riverside COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.5–-3.6), offensive rebounding (28.5–22.1).