Vanderbilt

27-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

67.9%Vanderbilt

32.1%Wake Forest

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -4.6

PROJECTED TOTAL162.3

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -212

Wake Forest

18-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 83

Projected Total162.3

Projected ScoreWake Forest 79

Team Comparison

VanderbiltMetricWake Forest

68.9MMH Power Index57.6

120.9Offensive Efficiency112.4

105.7Defensive Efficiency109.7

15.2Net Efficiency2.7

7.4Strength of Schedule7.2

2.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.1

70.9Tempo70.2

55.3%Effective FG%52.8%

13.5%Turnover Rate15.5%

30.8%Offensive Rebound %30.0%

39.3%Free Throw Rate36.1%

10.8Average Margin1.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Vanderbilt HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY67.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVanderbilt holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–57.6), offensive efficiency (120.9–112.4), defensive efficiency (105.7–109.7), net efficiency (15.2–2.7).

Final

Vanderbilt

98—67

Wake Forest

Vanderbilt by 31 • 72.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

VanderbiltTEAM STATWake Forest

35-59FG19-54

59.0%FG%35.0%

16-323PT4-21

50.0%3PT%19.0%

12-16FT25-32

75.0%FT%78.0%

29Rebounds34

6Offensive Rebounds13

23Assists8

12Turnovers17

14Steals7

6Blocks2

23Fouls17

Player Box Score

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyler Nickel	F	29	9-12	8-10	0-0	2	0	1	3	26
Duke Miles	G	31	4-5	2-3	7-8	1	9	5	1	17
Tyler Harris	F	17	6-12	1-5	1-3	3	0	1	1	14
Devin McGlockton	F	28	4-10	1-5	2-2	7	2	0	1	11
Tyler Tanner	G	27	5-8	1-2	0-1	4	7	5	0	11
Jalen Washington	C	17	2-4	1-2	2-2	3	0	0	0	7
Jayden Leverett	C	4	2-2	1-1	0-0	1	0	1	0	5
AK Okereke	F	22	2-4	0-2	0-0	1	3	0	0	4
Mike James	G	13	1-2	1-2	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Chandler Bing	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	1	0	0
Jaylon Dean-Vines	G	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Miles Keeffe	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Wake Forest

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Myles Colvin	G	37	6-11	2-7	6-6	12	1	3	0	20
Juke Harris	G	37	4-15	2-9	9-12	6	0	0	0	19
Jaylen Cross	F	13	2-3	0-0	3-4	2	1	0	0	7
Tre'Von Spillers	F	31	1-7	0-0	3-3	5	0	1	2	5
Omaha Biliew	F	23	1-5	0-2	3-5	3	0	1	0	5
Nate Calmese	G	15	2-4	0-0	0-0	0	3	0	0	4
Sebastian Akins	G	10	1-4	0-0	1-1	2	0	0	0	3
Isaac Carr	G	11	1-3	0-2	0-0	0	1	1	0	2
Mekhi Mason	G	7	1-2	0-1	0-1	0	0	0	0	2
Cooper Schwieger	F	11	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	2	1	0	0
Marqus Marion	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

72.9Possessions72.9

134.4Offensive Efficiency91.9

91.9Defensive Efficiency134.4

42.5Net Efficiency-42.5

72.9%Effective FG%38.9%

73.6%True Shooting %48.4%

16.5%Turnover Rate23.2%

27.1%Free Throw Rate59.3%

54.2%3-Point Rate38.9%

1.92Assist / Turnover0.47

Game Summary

Vanderbilt won by 31 points. The game played at approximately 72.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.