Cincinnati logo

Cincinnati

18-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.8%Cincinnati
58.2%Clemson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADClemson -3.4
PROJECTED TOTAL137.7
MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -139
Clemson logo

Clemson

24-10
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCincinnati 67
Projected Total137.7
Projected ScoreClemson 71

Team Comparison

61.5MMH Power Index59.9
105.3Offensive Efficiency112.6
97.3Defensive Efficiency101.4
8.0Net Efficiency11.2
5.1Strength of Schedule4.6
14.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
69.4Tempo63.6
50.6%Effective FG%53.0%
17.0%Turnover Rate14.0%
30.6%Offensive Rebound %27.0%
30.7%Free Throw Rate38.1%
5.5Average Margin7.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY58.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (112.6–105.3), net efficiency (11.2–8.0), shooting efficiency (53.0–50.6), ball security (14.0–17.0).
Cincinnati COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (61.5–59.9), defensive efficiency (97.3–101.4), strength of schedule (5.1–4.6).
Final
Cincinnati logo
Cincinnati
65—68
Clemson logo
Clemson
Clemson by 3 • 66.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

CincinnatiTEAM STATClemson
22-58FG24-50
38.0%FG%48.0%
10-253PT10-20
40.0%3PT%50.0%
11-15FT10-14
73.0%FT%71.0%
36Rebounds27
10Offensive Rebounds2
9Assists15
12Turnovers12
5Steals6
4Blocks1
13Fouls12

Player Box Score

Cincinnati
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Day Day ThomasG346-125-90-041300017
Moustapha ThiamC265-81-14-450110015
Jizzle JamesG293-91-23-433000010
Sencire HarrisG284-91-11-341000010
Baba MillerF302-70-23-47312007
Jalen CelestineG161-61-40-02000003
Shon AbaevG141-51-50-02001003
Halvine DzellatC140-10-00-05100000
Kerr KriisaG90-10-10-01000000
Clemson
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ace BucknerG275-111-21-223100012
Carter WellingF214-82-42-350100012
Jestin PorterG313-63-52-222110011
Dillon HunterG342-51-15-674000010
Nick DavidsonF274-52-20-043100010
RJ GodfreyF255-100-10-111100010
Jake WahlinF201-51-50-00200003
Butta JohnsonG80-00-00-02010000
Chase ThompsonF70-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

66.9Possessions66.9
97.2Offensive Efficiency101.6
101.6Defensive Efficiency97.2
-4.5Net Efficiency4.5
46.6%Effective FG%58.0%
49.9%True Shooting %60.0%
17.9%Turnover Rate18.0%
25.9%Free Throw Rate28.0%
43.1%3-Point Rate40.0%
0.75Assist / Turnover1.25
Game Summary
Clemson won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 66.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, True Shooting %, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.