
Cincinnati
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.8%Cincinnati
58.2%Clemson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADClemson -3.4
PROJECTED TOTAL137.7
MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -139

Clemson
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCincinnati 67
Projected Total137.7
Projected ScoreClemson 71
Team Comparison
61.5MMH Power Index59.9
105.3Offensive Efficiency112.6
97.3Defensive Efficiency101.4
8.0Net Efficiency11.2
5.1Strength of Schedule4.6
14.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
69.4Tempo63.6
50.6%Effective FG%53.0%
17.0%Turnover Rate14.0%
30.6%Offensive Rebound %27.0%
30.7%Free Throw Rate38.1%
5.5Average Margin7.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Clemson HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (112.6–105.3), net efficiency (11.2–8.0), shooting efficiency (53.0–50.6), ball security (14.0–17.0).
Cincinnati COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (61.5–59.9), defensive efficiency (97.3–101.4), strength of schedule (5.1–4.6).