
Florida A&M
14-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.9%Florida A&M
94.1%TCU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTCU -18.4
PROJECTED TOTAL148.1
MODEL MONEYLINETCU -1595

TCU
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 65
Projected Total148.1
Projected ScoreTCU 83
Team Comparison
39.4MMH Power Index59.7
98.7Offensive Efficiency110.2
105.6Defensive Efficiency102.7
-6.9Net Efficiency7.5
-3.2Strength of Schedule4.6
4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
70.6Tempo70.2
49.2%Effective FG%50.5%
21.6%Turnover Rate15.3%
30.5%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
38.0%Free Throw Rate38.3%
-4.8Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
TCU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY94.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTCU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.7–39.4), offensive efficiency (110.2–98.7), defensive efficiency (102.7–105.6), net efficiency (7.5–-6.9).
Florida A&M COUNTERS WITHrecent form (4.5–2.2).