Chattanooga

13-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

47.3%Chattanooga

52.7%Alabama A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAlabama A&M -1.6

PROJECTED TOTAL149.8

MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama A&M -111

Alabama A&M

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreChattanooga 74

Projected Total149.8

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 76

Team Comparison

ChattanoogaMetricAlabama A&M

45.9MMH Power Index42.3

112.7Offensive Efficiency105.9

110.5Defensive Efficiency106.6

2.2Net Efficiency-0.7

-4.4Strength of Schedule-6.8

-0.1Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3

68.1Tempo68.0

55.1%Effective FG%49.7%

14.1%Turnover Rate16.8%

23.5%Offensive Rebound %28.0%

29.2%Free Throw Rate45.7%

1.4Average Margin-0.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Chattanooga HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMChattanooga holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.9–42.3), offensive efficiency (112.7–105.9), net efficiency (2.2–-0.7), strength of schedule (-4.4–-6.8).

Alabama A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.6–110.5), recent form (3.3–-0.1), offensive rebounding (28.0–23.5).

Final

Chattanooga

73—66

Alabama A&M

Chattanooga by 7 • 63.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ChattanoogaTEAM STATAlabama A&M

25-52FG22-55

48.0%FG%40.0%

12-263PT5-19

46.0%3PT%26.0%

11-16FT17-23

69.0%FT%74.0%

35Rebounds36

5Offensive Rebounds9

16Assists12

8Turnovers8

4Steals5

2Blocks1

21Fouls20

Player Box Score

Chattanooga

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jordan Frison	G	36	8-13	2-3	9-9	9	5	2	0	27
Jikari Johnson	G	30	7-11	3-5	0-0	5	1	1	1	17
Billy Smith	G	30	3-8	3-5	0-0	2	3	0	1	9
Brennan Watkins	G	30	3-8	3-7	0-0	2	3	0	0	9
Josh Bowman	F	11	2-4	0-1	1-3	2	0	0	0	5
Houston Holland	G	18	1-1	1-1	0-1	5	1	1	0	3
Makai Richards	C	11	1-1	0-0	0-1	3	1	0	0	2
Parker Robison	G	13	0-2	0-1	1-2	1	1	0	0	1
Teddy Washington Jr.	G	17	0-2	0-2	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Collin Mulholland	F	4	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Koron Davis	G	32	6-12	2-4	5-7	10	1	2	0	19
Kintavious Dozier	G	37	4-14	1-5	8-8	5	4	0	0	17
PJ Eason	F	28	4-6	0-0	3-4	11	0	0	0	11
Sami Pissis	G	28	3-7	1-4	1-2	1	4	1	0	8
Gabe Kincy	G	28	2-6	1-5	0-1	1	0	0	0	5
Bilal Abdur-Rahman	G	9	2-4	0-0	0-1	1	2	0	0	4
Tajden Davis	G	10	1-4	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Lou Hutchinson	G	19	0-1	0-0	0-0	3	1	2	1	0
Angok Anyang	F	5	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Samuel Onu	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.8Possessions63.8

114.4Offensive Efficiency103.4

103.4Defensive Efficiency114.4

11.0Net Efficiency-11.0

59.6%Effective FG%44.5%

61.2%True Shooting %50.1%

12.8%Turnover Rate12.3%

30.8%Free Throw Rate41.8%

50.0%3-Point Rate34.5%

2.00Assist / Turnover1.50

Game Summary

Chattanooga won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 63.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.