
UT Arlington
18-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
58.9%UT Arlington
41.1%Oral Roberts
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Arlington -2.6
PROJECTED TOTAL144.1
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Arlington -143

Oral Roberts
10-23MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Arlington 73
Projected Total144.1
Projected ScoreOral Roberts 71
Team Comparison
49.6MMH Power Index41.8
102.7Offensive Efficiency104.3
97.9Defensive Efficiency110.2
4.8Net Efficiency-5.9
-0.8Strength of Schedule-1.5
-3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency0.6
68.1Tempo70.3
48.5%Effective FG%50.5%
20.4%Turnover Rate19.0%
36.0%Offensive Rebound %29.5%
43.7%Free Throw Rate37.8%
3.3Average Margin-4.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Arlington HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Arlington holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.6–41.8), defensive efficiency (97.9–110.2), net efficiency (4.8–-5.9), strength of schedule (-0.8–-1.5).
Oral Roberts COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (104.3–102.7), recent form (0.6–-3.9), shooting efficiency (50.5–48.5).