UT Arlington logo

UT Arlington

18-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
58.9%UT Arlington
41.1%Oral Roberts
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Arlington -2.6
PROJECTED TOTAL144.1
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Arlington -143
Oral Roberts logo

Oral Roberts

10-23
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Arlington 73
Projected Total144.1
Projected ScoreOral Roberts 71

Team Comparison

49.6MMH Power Index41.8
102.7Offensive Efficiency104.3
97.9Defensive Efficiency110.2
4.8Net Efficiency-5.9
-0.8Strength of Schedule-1.5
-3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency0.6
68.1Tempo70.3
48.5%Effective FG%50.5%
20.4%Turnover Rate19.0%
36.0%Offensive Rebound %29.5%
43.7%Free Throw Rate37.8%
3.3Average Margin-4.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UT Arlington HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY58.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Arlington holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.6–41.8), defensive efficiency (97.9–110.2), net efficiency (4.8–-5.9), strength of schedule (-0.8–-1.5).
Oral Roberts COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (104.3–102.7), recent form (0.6–-3.9), shooting efficiency (50.5–48.5).
Final
UT Arlington logo
UT Arlington
69—57
Oral Roberts logo
Oral Roberts
UT Arlington by 12 • 67.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT ArlingtonTEAM STATOral Roberts
24-51FG17-55
47.0%FG%31.0%
8-183PT2-20
44.0%3PT%10.0%
13-20FT21-25
65.0%FT%84.0%
35Rebounds34
9Offensive Rebounds12
14Assists7
14Turnovers14
11Steals11
2Blocks1
17Fouls16

Player Box Score

UT Arlington
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Marcell McCrearyG326-114-70-031200016
Cash ChavisG253-101-36-663000013
Bahsil LasterG243-61-13-410100010
Marcus Rigsby Jr.G293-71-30-02310007
Miles GoodmanF92-20-03-41000007
Raysean SeamsterF333-70-20-29431006
Cameron JacksonF263-40-00-28211006
Jordan LoweryG121-31-21-20110004
Tyran MasonG70-00-00-02010000
Amari ReedF30-10-00-00010000
Oral Roberts
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ty HarperG345-171-37-842100018
Ofri NavehF272-60-26-882300010
Yuto Yamanouchi-WilliamsF213-70-14-430210010
Connor DowG322-90-51-14110005
Luke GrayF121-51-52-22000005
Cal FurnishG252-30-10-02110004
Baron Smith Jr.F121-20-01-25000003
Jack TurnerG201-50-20-01000002
Martins KilupsG170-10-10-00130000

Advanced Game Stats

67.2Possessions67.2
102.7Offensive Efficiency84.8
84.8Defensive Efficiency102.7
17.9Net Efficiency-17.9
54.9%Effective FG%32.7%
57.0%True Shooting %42.6%
21.4%Turnover Rate20.3%
39.2%Free Throw Rate45.5%
35.3%3-Point Rate36.4%
1.00Assist / Turnover0.50
Game Summary
UT Arlington won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 67.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.