
Princeton
9-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
20.9%Princeton
79.1%Temple
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTemple -9.4
PROJECTED TOTAL142.8
MODEL MONEYLINETemple -378

Temple
16-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePrinceton 67
Projected Total142.8
Projected ScoreTemple 76
Team Comparison
43.5MMH Power Index50.9
105.1Offensive Efficiency112.2
110.3Defensive Efficiency107.4
-5.2Net Efficiency4.8
1.7Strength of Schedule-2.0
-8.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.5
65.2Tempo65.9
50.3%Effective FG%51.1%
16.9%Turnover Rate13.7%
27.5%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
35.0%Free Throw Rate42.3%
-3.4Average Margin3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Temple HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY79.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTemple holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.9–43.5), offensive efficiency (112.2–105.1), defensive efficiency (107.4–110.3), net efficiency (4.8–-5.2).
Princeton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–-2.0).