
IU Indianapolis
7-25GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.7%IU Indianapolis
94.3%Grand Canyon
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGrand Canyon -19.0
PROJECTED TOTAL161.7
MODEL MONEYLINEGrand Canyon -1654

Grand Canyon
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreIU Indianapolis 71
Projected Total161.7
Projected ScoreGrand Canyon 90
Team Comparison
39.2MMH Power Index59.8
109.3Offensive Efficiency109.2
115.5Defensive Efficiency99.1
-6.2Net Efficiency10.1
-2.5Strength of Schedule2.0
-9.2Last 10 Net Efficiency9.7
76.4Tempo69.3
52.9%Effective FG%52.1%
15.7%Turnover Rate17.6%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %31.2%
21.5%Free Throw Rate41.0%
-4.8Average Margin7.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Grand Canyon HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY94.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrand Canyon holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.8–39.2), defensive efficiency (99.1–115.5), net efficiency (10.1–-6.2), strength of schedule (2.0–-2.5).
IU Indianapolis COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (109.3–109.2), shooting efficiency (52.9–52.1), ball security (15.7–17.6).