Binghamton logo

Binghamton

8-22
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.9%Binghamton
73.1%Army
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADArmy -7.2
PROJECTED TOTAL144.0
MODEL MONEYLINEArmy -272
Army logo

Army

11-21
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBinghamton 68
Projected Total144.0
Projected ScoreArmy 76

Team Comparison

32.4MMH Power Index36.8
102.2Offensive Efficiency104.8
112.3Defensive Efficiency112.1
-10.1Net Efficiency-7.3
-6.0Strength of Schedule-3.3
-6.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.6
64.2Tempo68.9
51.3%Effective FG%49.8%
18.5%Turnover Rate17.3%
21.5%Offensive Rebound %31.0%
42.8%Free Throw Rate26.5%
-6.5Average Margin-5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Army HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY73.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMArmy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (36.8–32.4), offensive efficiency (104.8–102.2), defensive efficiency (112.1–112.3), net efficiency (-7.3–-10.1).
Binghamton COUNTERS WITHrecent form (-6.2–-10.6), shooting efficiency (51.3–49.8), free throw rate (42.8–26.5).
Final
Binghamton logo
Binghamton
85—95
Army logo
Army
Army by 10 • 78.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BinghamtonTEAM STATArmy
32-63FG31-61
51.0%FG%51.0%
4-203PT14-28
20.0%3PT%50.0%
17-22FT19-30
77.0%FT%63.0%
31Rebounds40
4Offensive Rebounds9
15Assists20
9Turnovers12
6Steals2
3Blocks1
27Fouls19

Player Box Score

Binghamton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jeremiah QuigleyG438-120-34-6512300020
Jackson BenigniG376-114-73-440200019
Wes Peterson Jr.G417-140-14-563100018
Zyier BeverlyF196-80-02-360010014
Bryson WilsonG242-60-14-44001008
Ryan RichardsonG442-80-50-02001004
Jake BlackburnG161-40-30-02000002
Nevin IbrociG10-00-00-00000000
Army
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jaxson BellG296-95-77-1060000024
Ryan CurryG445-94-79-1097100023
Jackson FurmanG335-113-60-042000013
Tate LaczkowskiF194-60-01-26400009
Jorn EversonF203-61-11-24200008
Jacen HollowayF343-81-10-45201007
Kevin McCarthyG243-90-50-02210006
Joshua EliF222-30-11-22100005

Advanced Game Stats

78.4Possessions78.4
108.4Offensive Efficiency121.2
121.2Defensive Efficiency108.4
-12.8Net Efficiency12.8
54.0%Effective FG%62.3%
57.9%True Shooting %63.1%
11.5%Turnover Rate15.3%
34.9%Free Throw Rate49.2%
31.7%3-Point Rate45.9%
1.67Assist / Turnover1.67
Game Summary
Army won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 78.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.