Towson

19-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

38.1%Towson

61.9%William & Mary

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -4.3

PROJECTED TOTAL149.4

MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -162

William & Mary

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTowson 73

Projected Total149.4

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 77

Team Comparison

TowsonMetricWilliam & Mary

54MMH Power Index53.8

106.7Offensive Efficiency112.5

101.9Defensive Efficiency105.2

4.8Net Efficiency7.3

0.5Strength of Schedule-1.5

4.6Last 10 Net Efficiency3.5

64.9Tempo73.9

47.9%Effective FG%55.3%

15.9%Turnover Rate16.4%

36.6%Offensive Rebound %26.7%

30.5%Free Throw Rate45.3%

3.1Average Margin5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Towson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY61.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTowson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.0–53.8), defensive efficiency (101.9–105.2), strength of schedule (0.5–-1.5), recent form (4.6–3.5).

William & Mary COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (112.5–106.7), net efficiency (7.3–4.8), shooting efficiency (55.3–47.9).

Final

Towson

70—84

William & Mary

William & Mary by 14 • 69.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TowsonTEAM STATWilliam & Mary

27-64FG30-56

42.0%FG%54.0%

7-253PT10-24

28.0%3PT%42.0%

9-16FT14-21

56.0%FT%67.0%

35Rebounds32

12Offensive Rebounds6

12Assists21

11Turnovers9

6Steals5

5Blocks1

22Fouls11

Player Box Score

Towson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dylan Williamson	G	39	6-12	3-5	0-0	2	5	2	1	15
Tyler Tejada	G	38	5-11	1-4	2-2	11	3	2	1	13
Tyler Schmidt	G	21	4-10	2-7	3-3	1	1	0	1	13
Jack Doumbia Jr.	F	27	5-10	0-1	2-4	4	2	0	1	12
Jaquan Womack	G	19	4-13	1-6	2-3	3	1	1	0	11
Tyler Coleman	F	22	2-3	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	1	4
Mor Seck	C	7	1-1	0-0	0-2	4	0	0	0	2
Caleb Embeya	F	16	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Ryan Conway	G	6	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Chike Ndefo	G	5	0-2	0-0	0-2	4	0	0	0	0

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kyle Pulliam	G	27	4-7	1-3	3-4	4	2	1	1	12
Jo'el Emanuel	F	16	4-5	0-1	4-4	1	3	1	0	12
Finn Lally	F	13	4-6	3-5	0-0	2	1	0	0	11
Chase Lowe	G	26	3-5	0-0	3-4	7	6	1	0	9
Tunde Vahlberg Fasasi	F	23	3-7	1-3	2-4	4	5	1	0	9
Kilian Brockhoff	F	21	4-6	1-2	0-1	2	2	0	0	9
Cade Haskins	F	20	3-6	2-5	1-2	4	0	0	0	9
Reese Miller	G	25	2-7	1-3	0-0	1	2	1	0	5
Jhei-R Jones	G	17	2-3	1-1	0-0	3	0	0	0	5
Ryan Jackson Jr.	G	12	1-4	0-1	1-2	3	0	0	0	3

Advanced Game Stats

69.8Possessions69.8

100.3Offensive Efficiency120.3

120.3Defensive Efficiency100.3

-20.1Net Efficiency20.1

47.7%Effective FG%62.5%

48.9%True Shooting %63.7%

15.6%Turnover Rate13.0%

25.0%Free Throw Rate37.5%

39.1%3-Point Rate42.9%

1.09Assist / Turnover2.33

Game Summary

William & Mary won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 69.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.