Lipscomb

18-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

11.7%Lipscomb

88.3%Cincinnati

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCincinnati -12.9

PROJECTED TOTAL146.6

MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -755

Cincinnati

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLipscomb 67

Projected Total146.6

Projected ScoreCincinnati 80

Team Comparison

LipscombMetricCincinnati

47.9MMH Power Index61.5

111.3Offensive Efficiency105.3

107.6Defensive Efficiency97.3

3.7Net Efficiency8.0

-2.5Strength of Schedule5.1

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency14.4

68.8Tempo69.4

54.8%Effective FG%50.6%

16.0%Turnover Rate17.0%

25.9%Offensive Rebound %30.6%

26.5%Free Throw Rate30.7%

2.5Average Margin5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY88.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–47.9), defensive efficiency (97.3–107.6), net efficiency (8.0–3.7), strength of schedule (5.1–-2.5).

Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (111.3–105.3), shooting efficiency (54.8–50.6), ball security (16.0–17.0).

Final

Lipscomb

62—89

Cincinnati

Cincinnati by 27 • 72.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LipscombTEAM STATCincinnati

22-57FG36-75

39.0%FG%48.0%

11-343PT11-29

32.0%3PT%38.0%

7-13FT6-9

54.0%FT%67.0%

31Rebounds45

6Offensive Rebounds14

16Assists21

14Turnovers8

2Steals5

2Blocks6

12Fouls16

Player Box Score

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ross Candelino	G	30	6-10	5-9	3-5	8	4	0	0	20
Grant Asman	F	25	3-6	3-5	0-0	5	1	0	1	9
Kellan Boylan	F	17	3-7	0-2	2-3	5	0	0	0	8
Mateo Esmeraldo	G	29	3-11	0-5	1-2	1	3	0	0	7
Charlie Williams	C	16	3-7	1-4	0-0	0	3	0	0	7
Titas Sargiunas	F	18	2-6	0-3	1-2	2	2	0	0	5
Kennedy Okpara	F	24	1-6	1-4	0-0	6	0	2	1	3
Cole Middleton	F	15	1-2	1-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
Or Ashkenazi	F	25	0-2	0-1	0-1	3	2	0	0	0
Luke Carter	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Cincinnati

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Moustapha Thiam	C	24	8-13	0-0	2-3	5	0	1	0	18
Jizzle James	G	25	7-11	2-5	0-1	0	5	2	1	16
Kerr Kriisa	G	20	5-8	5-8	0-0	1	2	0	0	15
Baba Miller	F	27	5-12	0-0	1-2	21	7	1	2	11
Day Day Thomas	G	22	3-6	2-5	0-0	1	3	0	1	8
Sencire Harris	G	19	3-5	0-0	1-1	3	1	0	1	7
Halvine Dzellat	C	16	3-5	0-0	0-0	6	0	0	1	6
Jalen Celestine	G	15	2-5	2-5	0-0	4	1	1	0	6
Shon Abaev	G	18	0-6	0-3	2-2	4	0	0	0	2
Keyshuan Tillery	G	9	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	2	0	0	0
Jordi Rodriguez	G	4	0-3	0-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Grant Darbyshire	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

72.3Possessions72.3

85.8Offensive Efficiency123.1

123.1Defensive Efficiency85.8

-37.3Net Efficiency37.3

48.2%Effective FG%55.3%

49.1%True Shooting %56.1%

19.7%Turnover Rate10.9%

22.8%Free Throw Rate12.0%

59.6%3-Point Rate38.7%

1.14Assist / Turnover2.63

Game Summary

Cincinnati won by 27 points. The game played at approximately 72.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.