
Drexel
17-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
21.0%Drexel
79.0%Charleston
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCharleston -8.2
PROJECTED TOTAL142.1
MODEL MONEYLINECharleston -376

Charleston
21-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDrexel 67
Projected Total142.1
Projected ScoreCharleston 75
Team Comparison
46.5MMH Power Index53.8
103.6Offensive Efficiency109.2
102.4Defensive Efficiency106.2
1.2Net Efficiency3.0
-0.4Strength of Schedule1.9
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency3.9
65.7Tempo69.1
51.3%Effective FG%50.6%
19.1%Turnover Rate15.4%
30.7%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
32.3%Free Throw Rate42.1%
0.8Average Margin2.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Charleston HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY79.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCharleston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–46.5), offensive efficiency (109.2–103.6), net efficiency (3.0–1.2), strength of schedule (1.9–-0.4).
Drexel COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.4–106.2), shooting efficiency (51.3–50.6), offensive rebounding (30.7–29.6).