
Campbell
15-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
19.4%Campbell
80.6%Hofstra
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -10.8
PROJECTED TOTAL151.2
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -415

Hofstra
24-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCampbell 70
Projected Total151.2
Projected ScoreHofstra 81
Team Comparison
51.1MMH Power Index59.3
110.9Offensive Efficiency114.0
111.0Defensive Efficiency100.9
-0.1Net Efficiency13.1
0.8Strength of Schedule-2.9
2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0
70.6Tempo66.2
51.3%Effective FG%52.2%
17.4%Turnover Rate16.1%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
44.2%Free Throw Rate32.0%
0.0Average Margin8.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY80.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–51.1), offensive efficiency (114.0–110.9), defensive efficiency (100.9–111.0), net efficiency (13.1–-0.1).
Campbell COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.8–-2.9), free throw rate (44.2–32.0).