
New Orleans
16-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
18.6%New Orleans
81.4%UT Rio Grande Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -10.9
PROJECTED TOTAL151.2
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -438

UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNew Orleans 70
Projected Total151.2
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 81
Team Comparison
47.1MMH Power Index55.8
107.0Offensive Efficiency112.6
109.6Defensive Efficiency103.1
-2.6Net Efficiency9.5
0.2Strength of Schedule-1.9
0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3
70.8Tempo67.4
50.5%Effective FG%55.7%
20.2%Turnover Rate17.9%
35.7%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
48.4%Free Throw Rate29.6%
-1.8Average Margin6.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY81.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–47.1), offensive efficiency (112.6–107.0), defensive efficiency (103.1–109.6), net efficiency (9.5–-2.6).
New Orleans COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.2–-1.9), offensive rebounding (35.7–29.2), free throw rate (48.4–29.6).