Prairie View A&M

19-18

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

8.8%Prairie View A&M

91.2%Texas A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -15.0

PROJECTED TOTAL158.3

MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M -1036

Texas A&M

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePrairie View A&M 72

Projected Total158.3

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 87

Team Comparison

Prairie View A&MMetricTexas A&M

41.6MMH Power Index58

105.6Offensive Efficiency116.1

103.9Defensive Efficiency108.4

1.7Net Efficiency7.7

-9.8Strength of Schedule4.8

4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2

73.8Tempo69.1

49.2%Effective FG%53.5%

15.9%Turnover Rate14.8%

27.7%Offensive Rebound %31.7%

42.9%Free Throw Rate37.5%

1.3Average Margin5.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY91.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–41.6), offensive efficiency (116.1–105.6), net efficiency (7.7–1.7), strength of schedule (4.8–-9.8).

Prairie View A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.9–108.4), recent form (4.4–-7.2), free throw rate (42.9–37.5).

Final

Prairie View A&M

82—111

Texas A&M

Texas A&M by 29 • 86.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Prairie View A&MTEAM STATTexas A&M

26-65FG38-70

40.0%FG%54.0%

6-223PT11-30

27.0%3PT%37.0%

24-31FT24-35

77.0%FT%69.0%

36Rebounds50

9Offensive Rebounds14

14Assists21

15Turnovers14

7Steals12

3Blocks6

23Fouls27

Player Box Score

Prairie View A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tai'Reon Joseph	G	34	9-20	3-10	5-5	5	0	2	0	26
Cory Wells	F	38	9-12	2-4	5-6	9	4	1	1	25
Lance Williams	G	35	3-12	0-3	6-8	3	6	1	1	12
Dontae Horne	G	30	3-10	1-3	4-6	3	2	2	1	11
Jannoy Thomas	G	9	1-2	0-0	1-2	0	0	1	0	3
Hassane Diallo	F	9	0-1	0-0	2-2	2	0	0	0	2
Ryan Bolton Jr.	C	6	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Joey Madimba	G	22	0-5	0-2	1-2	3	1	0	0	1
Corey Dunning	F	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	0
Keeshawn Mason	F	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Elijah Mitchell	G	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rashaun Agee	F	20	7-11	2-3	3-4	13	1	0	2	19
Marcus Hill	G	16	5-6	0-1	6-8	2	2	1	0	16
Rubén Dominguez	G	22	4-9	3-7	3-3	2	1	0	1	14
Pop Isaacs	G	21	5-9	3-6	0-1	2	3	0	0	13
Josh Holloway	G	21	4-7	1-1	1-4	2	1	0	0	10
Jacari Lane	G	16	2-4	1-3	4-4	0	1	0	0	9
Rylan Griffen	G	23	2-6	0-3	4-5	4	5	6	0	8
Ali Dibba	G	22	4-8	0-1	0-0	5	3	5	0	8
Jamie Vinson	F	9	2-3	0-1	2-2	5	1	0	0	6
Federiko Federiko	F	14	2-3	0-0	1-2	5	2	0	3	5
Zach Clemence	F	13	1-2	1-2	0-2	5	1	0	0	3
Chris McDermott	F	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Jeremiah Green	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Noah Shelby	G	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

86.2Possessions86.2

95.1Offensive Efficiency128.8

128.8Defensive Efficiency95.1

-33.6Net Efficiency33.6

44.6%Effective FG%62.1%

51.4%True Shooting %64.1%

17.5%Turnover Rate16.2%

47.7%Free Throw Rate50.0%

33.8%3-Point Rate42.9%

0.93Assist / Turnover1.50

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 29 points. The game played at approximately 86.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.